UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement. |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)). |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement. |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials. |
☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12. |
ENERGEN CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
March 22, 20172018
To Our Shareholders:
It is our pleasure to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Energen Corporation.Corporation (“Energen” or the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be held at the principal office of the Company in Birmingham, Alabama on Wednesday,Thursday, May 3, 2017,2018, at 8:30 a.m., Central Daylight Time.
DetailsYour Board of Directors (or the matters“Board”) is recommending a highly qualified and experienced slate of director nominees for election to be presentedthe Board of Directors at this meeting are giventhe Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, we will ask you to: (1) elect three directors for three-year terms ending in 2021, one director for atwo-year term ending in 2020, and two directors forone-year terms ending in 2019; (2) ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year; (3) consider an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; and (4) consider such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
The accompanying materials include the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement describes the business that we will conduct at the Annual Meeting. It also provides information about your Company that you should consider when you vote your shares.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, and in the Proxy Statement that follow.
We hopewe request that you will be able to attend this meeting so that wevote your shares FOR the Board’s nominees and all other proposals submitted by the Board by using the enclosed proxy card. Voting is easy – you may havevote electronically by following the opportunity of meeting with you and discussing the affairs of the Company. However, if you cannot attend, we would appreciate your submitting your proxy by telephone or by Internet, or by completing, signing and returninginstructions provided on the enclosed proxy card, or sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
Holders of shares as soon as convenient so that your stock may be voted.of the close of business on February 28, 2018, the record date for voting at the Annual Meeting, are urged to vote FOR the Board’s nominees and the Company’s other proposals.
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being sent or given to shareholders on or about March 22, 2018.
Yours very truly,
Chairman of the Board
ENERGEN CORPORATION
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held May 3, 20172018
TIME AND DATE | 8:30 a.m., | |
PLACE | Energen Plaza 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707 Directions to the Annual Meeting are available by calling Investor Relations at 1-800-654-3206. | |
AGENDA | (1) To • three members of the Board of Directors for three-year terms; • one member of the Board of Directors for atwo-year term; and • two members of the Board of Directors forone-year
(2) To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
(3) To cast an advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation
(4)
| |
RECORD DATE | You | |
PROXY VOTING |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD MAY 3, 2017:2018:
The Company’s Proxy Statement, on Schedule 14A, form of proxy card and 2016 annual reportAnnual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 are available at:www.annualmeeting.energen.com.
Birmingham, Alabama
| ||
Secretary |
March 22, 2018
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page |
i
23 | ||||||
24 | ||||||
24 | ||||||
25 | ||||||
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | ||||||
ADMINISTRATIONOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ROLESAND RESPONSIBILITIES | ||||||
O | ||||||
NO EXECUTIVE-ONLY WELFAREOR RETIREMENT BENEFITSOR TAX GROSS-UPS | 43 | |||||
44 | ||||||
44 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
57 | ||||||
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ||||||
ii
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF ENERGEN CORPORATION
MAYMay 3, 20172018
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not include all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. This Proxy Statement was first distributed beginning on or about March 22, 2018. In this Proxy Statement, Energen Corporation may also be referred to as “we”, “us”, “Energen” or the “Company”.
20172018 ANNUAL MEETINGOF SHAREHOLDERS
• Date and Time: | ||
• Place: | Energen Plaza 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707 | |
• Record Date: | February 28, |
VOTING MATTERSAND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
Voting Item | Our Board’s
| |
Election of Director Nominees (page | FOR each Director Nominee | |
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor (page | FOR | |
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (page | FOR | |
|
DIRECTOR NOMINEES (BEGINNINGON PAGE 99))
The following table provides summary information about each Director nominee. Our Directors serveThree of our Director nominees are standing for election for three-year terms: Jonathan Z. Cohen, William G. Hargett and Alan A. Kleier. One of our Director nominees is standing for election for atwo-year term: Vincent J. Intrieri. Laurence M. Downes and Lori A. Lancaster are standing for election forone-year terms.
In January 2018, we received notice from Corvex Master Fund, LP and its affiliates, including Corvex Management LP (together, “Corvex”), that they intended to nominate four individuals for election to our Board of Directors at our Annual Meeting. On March 6, 2018, our Company reached an understanding with Corvex and entered into a letter agreement regarding nominations to our Board of Directors and certain other related matters. Pursuant to the terms although Mr. Downes is beingof the letter agreement and in accordance with the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and Alabama corporate law, on March 6, 2018 our Board of Directors increased the size of our Board to eleven (11) Directors and appointed Jonathan Z. Cohen and Vincent J. Intrieri to our Board to fill the vacancies created by the expansion of our Board. Each of our Director nominees has consented to be nominated and to continue to serve as a Director if elected. However, if any Director nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve as a Director if elected, the proxy holders may vote for a one-year term.another person nominated by our Board of Directors.
Name | Age | Director Since | Primary Occupation | Committee Memberships | Other Public Company Boards | |||||||
Kenneth W. Dewey* | 63 | 2007 | Co-founder and director of Caymus Capital Partners | A**, C | N/A | |||||||
M. James Gorrie* | 54 | 2014 | Chief Executive Officer of Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC | A, G | ProAssurance Corporation | |||||||
James T. McManus, II | 58 | 2006 | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Energen | N/A | ||||||||
Laurence M. Downes* | 59 | N/A | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of New Jersey Resources Corporation | ± | New Jersey Resources Corporation |
Name | Age | Director Since | Primary Occupation | Committee Memberships | Other Public Company Boards | |||||||
Jonathan Z. Cohen* | 47 | 2018 | Chief Executive Officer, Osprey Energy Acquisition Corporation; Executive Chairman, Atlas Energy Group, LLC | C | Osprey Energy Acquisition Corp.; Atlas Energy Group, LLC; Titan Energy, LLC | |||||||
William G. Hargett* | 68 | 2015 | Former Chairman, President and CEO of Houston Exploration Company | A, G** | N/A | |||||||
Alan A. Kleier* | 64 | 2015 | Former Vice President,Mid-Continent Business Unit of Chevron | A, G | N/A | |||||||
Vincent J. Intrieri* | 61 | 2018 | Chief Executive Officer, VDA Capital Management; Former Senior Managing Director, Icahn Capital Management | A | Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.; Navistar International Corporation; Transocean, Ltd.; Conduent Inc. | |||||||
Laurence M. Downes* | 60 | 2017 | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of New Jersey Resources Corporation | A, C | New Jersey Resources Corporation | |||||||
Lori A. Lancaster* | 48 | 2017 | Oil and gas exploration (E&P) sector investment banker | A | N/A |
A | Audit Committee |
C | Compensation Committee |
G | Governance & Nominations Committee |
* Independent Director or Director Nominee
** Chair of Committee
± Mr. Downes will serve on the Audit and Compensation Committees if elected to the Board.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
1. | WHYDID I RECEIVETHESE PROXY MATERIALS? |
We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Energen Corporation, an Alabama corporation, of proxies for use at the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company and at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.
You are invited to attend our Annual Meeting on May 3, 2017,2018, beginning at 8:30 a.m., CDT.Central Daylight Time. The Annual Meeting will be held at our principal office, 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North,
Blvd. North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707. You may call Investor Relations at1-800-654-3206 for additional directions to the Annual Meeting location.
The Notice Regarding theof Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”), Proxy Statement and form ofthe proxy or voting instruction card are being mailed or made available to shareholders beginning on or about March 22, 2017.
Shareholders will vote on four items at the Annual Meeting:
At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any other matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting.2018.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares:
WHOIS ENTITLEDTO VOTEATTHE ANNUAL MEETING? |
HoldersYou can vote if, as of record of Energen common stock at the close of business on February 28, 2017 are entitled to receive this notice2018, you were a shareholder of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting.record of Energen common stock. As of that date, a total of
97,187,767 97,404,730 shares of common
stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
WHATISA QUORUMFORTHE ANNUAL MEETING? |
The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Proxies relating to shares held by
beneficial owners that are voted by brokers on some matters will be treated as shares present for determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be treated as shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on those matters as to which authority to vote is withheld from the broker (i.e., brokernon-votes).
4. | WHAT ISTHE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDING SHARESASA SHAREHOLDEROF RECORDANDASA BENEFICIAL OWNER? |
If your shares are registered in your name with Energen’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are the “shareholder of record” of those shares. The Notice of Internet Availability and, if requested, Proxy Statement and any accompanying materials have been provided directly to you by Energen.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares. The Notice of Internet Availability and, if requested, Proxy Statement and any accompanying materials have been forwarded
to you by your broker, bank or other holder of
record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instructions included on the Notice of Internet Availability, or the form of proxy or voting instruction card, or by following your holder of record’s instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.
If you hold your shares as a participant in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan, the proxy that you submit will provide your voting instructions to the plan trustee. If you do not
submit a proxy, the plan trustee will vote your
plan shares in the same proportion as the
shares for which the trustee receives voting instructions from other participants in that plan.To allow sufficient time for the savings planEmployee
Savings Plan trustees to tabulate the vote of the
plan shares, your voting instructions must be received before the close of businessby 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 28, 2017. 30, 2018.
5. | HOW DO I VOTE? |
Shareholders of record may vote using any of the following methods:
By mail
Complete, sign and date the accompanying proxy or voting instruction card and return it in the prepaid envelope. If you return your signed proxy card but do not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares represented by your proxy card as recommended by the Board of Directors.
If you do not have the prepaid envelope, please mail your completed proxy card to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 30202, College Station,TX 77842-9909.
By telephone or on the Internet
Shareholders of record can vote by calling the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card. Please have the proxy card handy when you call.Easy-to-follow voice prompts will allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
You may instruct the proxies how to vote by following the instructions listed on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card to vote online. The website for Internet voting for shareholders of record is www.investorvote.com/EGN. As with telephone voting, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you also can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 2, 2017.2018.
If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not have to return your proxy or voting instruction card.
Voting by Employee Savings Plan participants
If you held your shares as a participant in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan, you can vote the shares of common stock held for your account through any of the proxy voting options set forth above..To allow sufficient time
for the Employee Savings Plan trustees totabulate the vote of the plan shares, your votinginstructions must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 30, 2018.
Voting by beneficial owners
The Notice of Internet Availability and, if requested, Proxy Statement and any accompanying materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instructions included in the materials forwarded to you by the holder of record, which may be different from the instructions mailed to shareholders of record, or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or on the Internet.record. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners will depend on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other holder of record. We therefore recommend that you follow the voting instructions in the materials you receive.
In person at the Annual Meeting
Shareholders who attend the Annual Meeting may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. However, we encourage you to vote your proxy by Internet, telephone or mail prior to the meeting, even if you plan to attend in person. You may also be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the inspectorsinspector of election with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Please vote promptly
Your vote is important. You can save us the expense of a second mailingsubsequent mailings by voting promptly.
6. | WHAT CAN I DOIF I CHANGE MY MIND AFTER I VOTE? |
Shareholders of record
You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:
◾ | written notice to the Secretary of the Company; |
◾ | timely delivery of a valid, later-dated proxy; or |
◾ | voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting. |
Beneficial owners
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other holder of record.
Employee Savings Plan participants
If you hold shares in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan, you can change your voting instructions for those shares by voting again by telephone or by Internetelectronically or by returning a later dated proxy card.To allow sufficient time for the savings planEmployee Savings Plan trustees to tabulate the vote of the plan shares, if you hold shares in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan, your voting instructions (or any change to such instructions) must be received before the close of businessby 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 28, 2017.30, 2018.
7. | WHAT I |
The presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled toShareholders will vote on three items at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, is necessaryMeeting:
◾ | the election of three members of the Board of Directors for three-year terms, one member of the Board of Directors for atwo-year term, and two members of the Board of Directors forone-year terms; |
◾ | ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Energen’s |
independent registered public accounting firm for 2018; and |
◾ | an advisory vote on Energen’s executive compensation. |
At the date this Proxy Statement went to constitute a quorum. Abstentions are counted as present and entitledpress, we did not know of any other matters to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Proxies relating to shares held by
beneficial owners that are voted by brokers on some matters will be treated as shares present for determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be treated as shares entitled to voteraised at the Annual Meeting on those matters as to which authority to vote is withheld from the broker (i.e. broker non-votes).Meeting.
8. | WHAT |
IfThe Board of Directors recommends that you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker on how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker,shares:
◾ | “FOR” election of each of the Board’s nominees to the Board of Directors; |
◾ | “FOR” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Energen’s |
independent registered public accounting firm for 2018; and |
your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of Directors, the advisory approval of executive compensation or the advisory approval of the frequency of shareholder approval of executive compensation without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.
◾ | “FOR” the proposal regarding an advisory vote on executive compensation. |
9. | WHAT ARETHE VOTING REQUIREMENTSTO ELECTTHE DIRECTORSANDTO APPROVE EACHOFTHE PROPOSALS DISCUSSEDINTHIS PROXY STATEMENT? |
Proposal | Vote Required | Broker Allowed | ||
Election of Directors | Majority of Votes Cast | No | ||
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers | Majority of Votes Cast | Yes | ||
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation | Majority of Votes Cast | |||
| No |
If you abstain from voting or there is a brokernon-vote on any matter, your abstention or brokernon-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote, because abstentions and brokernon-votes are not considered to be votes cast.
Election of Directors; Majority Vote Policy
Directors must be elected by a majority of the votes cast.vote. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a
Director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee.
Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not counted as votes “for” or “against” a Director nominee.
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
The votes cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “against” to approve the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not counted as votes “for” or “against” this proposal.
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
The votes cast “for” must exceed the votes cast “against” to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named Executive Officers.executive officers. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not counted as votes “for” or “against” this proposal.
Advisory Approval of Frequency of Approval of Executive Compensation
The option that receives the highest number of votes cast by the shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation deemed approved by the shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes for any of the options.
10. | HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTEDATTHE ANNUAL MEETING? |
At the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders appointed by the Board of Directors (the persons named in the proxy card or, if applicable, their substitutes) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends, which is:
◾ | FORelection of each of the Director nominees named in this Proxy Statement; |
◾ | FORthe ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our |
independent registered public accounting firm for the |
◾ | FORthe approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our |
11. | WHAT ISA BROKER NON-VOTE? |
If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker on how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “brokernon-vote.” In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, even if the broker does not
receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of Directors or the advisory approval of executive
compensation without instructions from you, in which case a brokernon-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.
12. | COULD OTHER MATTERS BE DECIDEDATTHE ANNUAL MEETING? |
At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.
If you return your signed and completed proxy
card or vote by telephone or on the Internetelectronically and other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the proxy holders appointed by the Board of Directors will have the discretion to vote for you on such matters.
13. | WHO WILL PAYFORTHE COSTOF |
Energen will pay the cost of soliciting proxies.proxies by the Company. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our Directors, officers or employees in person or by telephone, mail, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmission. Copies of proxy materials will be supplied to brokers, dealers, banks and voting trustees, or their nominees, to
solicit proxies from beneficial
owners, and we will reimburse these institutions for their reasonable expenses.
We have also engaged Okapi Partners, LLC of New YorkInnisfree M&A Incorporated to assist us in the solicitation of proxies. We will pay Okapiproxies for a fee not to exceed $7,500,of $20,000 plus reasonable expenses, for these services.expenses.
14. |
Representatives of our transfer agent, Computershare, will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.
WHY DID I RECEIVEA “NOTICE REGARDINGTHE AVAILABILITYOF PROXY MATERIALS” BUT NO PROXY MATERIALS? |
We distribute our proxy materials to shareholders via the Internet under the “Notice and Access” approach permitted by rules of the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). This approach conserves natural resources and reduces our distribution costs,
while providing a timely and convenient method
of accessing the materials and voting. On or about March 22, 2017,2018, we mailed a “Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials” to shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet.
15. | CAN I ACCESSTHE NOTICEOF ANNUAL MEETING, PROXY STATEMENTANDTHE |
This Proxy Statement, the form of proxy card and the 2016 Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 are available atwww.annualmeeting.energen.com. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC rules
permit the Company to provide
shareholders with proxy materials electronically instead of in paper form, even if they have not made an election to receive the material electronically.
16. | WHATARETHE HOUSEHOLDING RULES? |
The SEC’s householding rules allow us to deliver only one set of proxy materials to shareholders who share an address unless otherwise requested. This procedure reduces printing and mailing costs. If you share an address with another shareholder and have
received only one set of proxy materials from the Company, you may request a separate copy of these materials by calling our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at(877) 456-3524 (from the U.S. and Canada) or +1 (412)232-3651 (from other locations).
If you are a registered shareholder and wish to change your election with regard to householding for future mailings, please write to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 605 Richard Arrington Blvd. North, Birmingham, AL 35203-2707.
If you are a beneficial owner, the bank, broker or other holder of record may deliver only one copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement to shareholders who have the same
address unless the bank, broker or other holder of record has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies for the proxy materials and wish to receive a single copy in the future, should contact their bank, broker or other holder of record to request that only a single copy be delivered to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORSOUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Our Board of Directors (or, the “Board”) has nominated three Directors for election for three-year terms, and one Director nominee for election for atwo-year term and two Directors for election forone-year term. terms. The Board is divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. The terms of threesix of the present Directors expire at this Annual Meeting: Kenneth W. Dewey,Jonathan Z. Cohen, William G. Hargett, Alan A. Kleier, Vincent J. Intrieri, Laurence M. James GorrieDownes and James T. McManus, II.Lori A. Lancaster. Messrs. Dewey, GorrieCohen, Hargett and McManusKleier have been nominated for re-electionelection as Directors for terms expiring in 2020. The Board also2021. Mr. Intrieri has been nominated Laurence M. Downes to servefor election as a Director for a term expiring in 2018. Stephen A. Snider is retiring from our Board effective2020. Mr. Downes and Ms. Lancaster have been nominated for election as of the date of the Annual Meeting.Directors for terms expiring in 2019.
Our Board of Directors recommends that Kenneth W. Dewey, M. James Gorrieshareholders vote FOR the election of Jonathan Z. Cohen, William G. Hargett, and James T. McManus, II be electedAlan A. Kleier to serve in the class with terms expiring in 2020 and Laurence M. Downes be elected2021, FOR the election of Vincent J. Intrieri to serve in the class with a term expiring in 2018.2020, and FOR the election of Laurence M. Downes and Lori A. Lancaster to serve in the class with terms expiring in 2019.Each nominee has agreed to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. We expect each nominee for election as a Director to be able to serve if elected. Biographical data on these nominees and the other members of the Board of Directors is presented below under the caption “Governance“Election of Directors.”
Messrs. William G. Hargett and Alan A. Kleier were elected by the shareholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting and Mr. Laurence M. Downes was elected by the shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Ms. Lori A. Lancaster was appointed to the Board of Directors, effective July 21, 2017. Messrs. Jonathan Z. Cohen and Vincent J. Intrieri were appointed to the Board of Directors, effective March 6, 2018, in connection with the Company’s entry into a letter agreement with Corvex regarding nominations to our Board of Directors and certain related matters. Prior to entry into the letter agreement, Corvex had indicated its intention to nominate Messrs. Jonathan Z. Cohen and Vincent J. Intrieri, along with two additional nominees, for election to the Company’s Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Corvex agreed to withdraw its previously announced nominations to the Board of Directors, and to vote its shares in favor of each of the Company.”six Director nominees. In addition to withdrawal of its nominations, Corvex also agreed to voluntarily dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit captionedCorvex Management LP, Appellant v. Energen Corporation, Appellee then pending before the Supreme Court of Alabama appealing a lower court order granting Energen’s request for declaratory and injunctive relief against Corvex.
Unless you otherwise direct on the proxy form, the proxy holders intend to vote your shares in favor of the above listedBoard’s nominees. To be elected,Under the majority vote standard applicable under Alabama law, a nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.proxy in order to be elected. If one or more of the Board’s nominees becomes unavailable for election or service as a Director, the proxy holders may vote your shares for one or more substitutes designated by the Board of Directors.
GOVERNANCEELECTION OF THE COMPANYDIRECTORS
The members of our Board of Directors, including the foursix nominees for election, are identified below.
NOMINEESFOR ELECTIONAS DIRECTORSFOR THREE-YEAR TERMS EXPIRINGIN 20202021
Name and Year First Became Director |
Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
Director since | Mr. | |
| ||
| Resource America, Inc., an asset manager investing in real estate, financial services and credit until its sale toC-III Capital Partners. Mr. |
NOMINEE FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORFORA ONE-YEAR TERM EXPIRINGIN 2018
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIREIN 2018
companies emerged from Chapter 11 in September 2016. | |||
|
| ||
WILLIAM G. HARGETT Director since 2015 | Mr. Hargett, |
Name and Year First Became Director | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
ALAN A. KLEIER Director since 2015 | Mr. Kleier, |
NOMINEE FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORFORA TWO-YEAR TERM EXPIRINGIN 2020
Name and Year First Became Director | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
VINCENT J. INTRIERI Director since March 6, 2018 | Mr. Intrieri, 61, currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of VDA Capital Management LLC, a private investment firm, which he founded in January 2017. From October 1998 until December 2016, Mr. Intrieri was employed by Carl C. Icahn-related entities in various investment-related capacities. From January 2008 to December 2016, Mr. Intrieri served as Senior Managing Director of Icahn Capital LP, the entity through which Carl C. Icahn manages private investment funds. In addition, from November 2004 to December 2016, Mr. Intrieri was a Senior Managing Director of Icahn Onshore LP, the general partner of Icahn Partners LP, and Icahn Offshore LP, the general partner of Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, entities through which Mr. Icahn invests in securities. Mr. Intrieri is a director of Transocean, Ltd., a public provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells (since May 2014); Conduent Incorporated, a business process services company that was launched on January 3, 2017 following its separation from Xerox (since January 2017; however, Mr. Intrieri is not standing for reelection at the Conduent 2018 annual meeting); Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., a public company engaged in the car rental business (since September 2014); and Navistar International Corporation, a truck and engine manufacturer (since October 2012). Following Conduent’s May 2018 annual meeting, Mr. Intrieri will be serving on only four public company boards. Mr. Intrieri previously served as a director of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, an oil and gas exploration and production company, from June 2012 to September 2016; CVR Refining, GP, LLC, the general partner of CVR Refining, LP, an independent downstream energy limited partnership, from September 2012 to September 2014; Forest Laboratories Inc., a supplier of pharmaceutical products, from June 2013 to June 2014; CVR Energy, Inc., a diversified holding company primarily engaged in the petroleum refining and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing industries, from May 2012 to May 2014; Federal-Mogul Holdings Corporation, a supplier of automotive powertrain and safety components, from December 2007 to June 2013; Icahn Enterprises L.P., a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment, automotive, energy, gaming, railcar, food packaging, metals, real estate and home fashion, from July 2006 to September 2012; and was Senior Vice President of Icahn Enterprises L.P. from January 2011 to March 2012. In addition, during the course of his career, Mr. Intrieri has served as a director of a number of other public companies in a broad range of industries. Mr. Intrieri graduated, with Distinction, from The Pennsylvania State University (Erie Campus) with a B.S. in Accounting in 1984. Mr. Intrieri was a certified public accountant. |
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORSFOR ONE-YEAR TERMS EXPIRINGIN 2019
Name | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
LAURENCE M. DOWNES Director since 2017 | Mr. Downes, 60, is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of New Jersey Resources Corporation (NYSE:NJR), an energy infrastructure and services holding company with natural gas distribution, energy services, clean energy, and midstream assets. He has served as President and CEO since 1995 and Chairman since 1996. He is a Director and past Chairman of the American Gas Association and the Natural Gas Council, a member of the National Petroleum Council, and a Trustee of the American Gas Foundation. Mr. Downes is Chair of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority and the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development’s National Advisory Board at Rutgers University and serves as a member of the Board of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. Prior to its September 2016 acquisition, Mr. Downes served as a director of Questar Corporation. Mr. Downes is a graduate of Iona College (B.B.A. Finance and M.B.A.) and an alumnus of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program. | |
LORI A. LANCASTER Director since 2017 | Ms. Lancaster, 48, is a former energy investment banker with 18 years of experience as a strategic and financial advisor to public and private corporate and financial sponsor clients on a wide range of projects, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, capital raising, leveraged buyouts and restructurings. For most of her investment banking career, Ms. Lancaster covered clients operating in the E&P sector. She last served as Managing Director in the Global Energy Group for UBS Securities from December 2013 until August 2016. Prior to UBS, she was Managing Director in the Global Natural Resources Group for Nomura Securities from July 2010 until December 2013. She also held several positions with Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1999 to 2008, including Managing Director in the Global Natural Resources Group, Upstream Oil & Gas Sector Captain and Financial Sponsor Industry Execution Captain. She is a graduate of Texas Christian University (B.B.A. Finance) and The University of Chicago Booth School of Business (M.B.A.). |
DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIREIN 2019
Name and Year First Became Director |
Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
| ||
JAY GRINNEY Director since 2012 | Mr. Grinney, |
Name and Year First Became Director | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
FRANCES POWELL HAWES Director since 2013 | Ms. Hawes, |
DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIREIN 2020
Name and Year First Became Director | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
KENNETH W. DEWEY Director since 2007 | Mr. Dewey, 64, is aco-founder and board member of Caymus Capital Partners, a market-neutral energy equity fund manager. Mr. Dewey was aco-founder of Randall & Dewey, a full-service transaction advisory firm specializing in oil and gas mergers, acquisitions and divestments. Randall & Dewey provided marketing, transaction, evaluation and research services for clients ranging from small, privately held firms to integrated energy companies and major oil companies. Mr. Dewey served as Randall & Dewey’s Chief Financial Officer from 1989 until his 2006 retirement following the firm’s 2005 acquisition by Jefferies & Company. From 1978 to 1989, Mr. Dewey held a variety of positions with Amoco Corporation and its subsidiaries. Mr. Dewey is a graduate of Stanford University (A.B. economics) and Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (M.B.A.). | |
M. JAMES GORRIE Director since 2014 | Mr. Gorrie, 55, is CEO of Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC, one of the largest privately held construction firms in the United States. It provides construction and construction management services for a wide variety of projects, including commercial, institutional, healthcare, industrial, and treatment plant construction. Mr. Gorrie joined Brasfield & Gorrie in 1984 and served in various roles prior to his election as President in 1994, a position which he held until 2015. He has served as CEO since his election to that position in 2011. Mr. Gorrie serves as a director of one other publicly traded company, ProAssurance Corporation. He is a graduate of Auburn University (B.S. building science). |
Name and Year First Became Director | Principal Occupation and Other Information | |
JAMES T. MCMANUS, II Director since 2006 | Mr. McManus, 59, is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He has been employed by Energen Corporation and its subsidiaries in various capacities since 1986. He was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Energen Resources Corporation in October 1995 and President of Energen Resources in April 1997. He was elected President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective January 1, 2006, Chief Executive Officer effective July 1, 2007, and Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McManus worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers as a certified public accountant. Prior to its September 2016 acquisition, Mr. McManus served as a director of Questar Corporation. He is a graduate of the University of Alabama (B.S. accounting). |
Each of our Directors also serves as a Director of Energen Resources Corporation (“Energen Resources”), our principal subsidiary.
DIRECTOR SKILLSAND QUALIFICATIONS
Our Governance and Nominations Committee considers the qualifications and backgrounds of each of our Directors when nominated for service on our Board of Directors,Directors. This year, our Governance and Nominations Committee reviewed the qualifications and backgrounds of Messrs. Hargett, Kleier, and Downes and Ms. Lancaster, and our full Board reviewed the qualifications and backgrounds of Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri. In each instance, our Board believes that each Director named above possesses skills and qualifications that enhance the quality of the Board as a whole. With respect to the foursix nominees, we note that:
experience with a major international oil and gas company, including senior operations experience in upstream oil and gas, and recent and relevant experience in the onshore North American market. During Mr. Kleier’s time as Vice President of Chevron’s Permian Basin Unit, he was responsible for 225,000 BOEPD and a $2 billion capital budget. Mr. Kleier’s expertise in the Permian Basin add tremendous value to his service on our Board. |
and business analysis perspectives of a public company chief executive officer, significant financial expertise, and energy industry experience and knowledge. |
Ms. Lancaster has many years of investment banking experience in the global oil and gas industry, including service as a Managing Director of the global natural resources groups at each of UBS Securities LLC, Nomura Securities International and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. She provides our Board with significant expertise regarding E&P company financing, including equity and debt financing in the public markets, and experience advising companies with respect to acquisition and merger opportunities in the E&P sector. |
Our nominees’ respective business backgrounds are discussed above in more detail.
With respect to our five sitting directors, we note that:
Our nominees’sitting directors’ respective business backgrounds are discussed above in more detail.
Our Governance and Nominations Committee identifies and evaluates Board candidates using one or more informal processes deemed appropriate for the circumstances. A determination of whether to pursue discussions with a particular individual is made after discussion by the Committee and may be preceded by formal or informal discussions involving one or more or all of the other Board members. Information considered by the Committee may include information provided by the candidate and one or more Committee or Board members. The Committee will also consider potential committee service by Board candidates at the time such candidates are evaluated for membership on the Board and, if the Board has vacancies on a particular committee or foresees such a vacancy, the
Committee may be more likely to consider Board candidates with credentials and experience suitable for service on such committee. Board
candidates are expected to possess high personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the shareholders. They are also expected to have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom, and good judgment. In addition to these fundamental characteristics, the Committee seeks to assemble and maintain a Board membership with a diverse portfolio of expertise, education, and experience conducive to generating multiple perspectives on the business, community, and strategic issues and opportunities encountered or anticipated by the Company.Company in its pursuit to generate long-term shareholder value.
Although our Board does not establish specific goals with respect to racial and gender diversity, the Board’s overall diversity is a consideration in the Director nomination process. The Committee reviews the Director nominees (including any shareholder nominees) and ascertains whether the Director nominees meet the criteria set forth above and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board and the Committee believe that the collective experience of the Director nominees and continuing Directors allow the Board to best fulfill its responsibilities to the long-term interests of our shareholders.
Our Board also believes that length of Board service should be considered in order to achieve an appropriate balance between the detailed Company knowledge and background that comes with years of service and the fresh perspective of newer Board members. Of our six Director nominees, four have served less than one year, while all six have served less than three full years. Our full Board has a good mix of experienced and new Directors, with more than 60% of the Directors serving less than five years, for an average tenure of 4 years. Once appropriate Board candidates have been identified, the Committee recommends nominations to our Board.
During fall 2016,Ms. Lancaster was appointed in anticipationJuly 2017 to fill the vacancy on the Board created by the resignation of future Director retirements,T. Michael Goodrich following our 2017 Annual Meeting. The Governance and Nominations Committee solicited suggestions for Board candidates from all Directors, certain of its outside advisors, including advisors in the Committee reviewed its prior discussionsoil and gas industry, and various contacts of the Board who might know of potential boarddirector candidates. Based on initial discussions with potential candidates and
desired attributes. With respect to attributes, in addition to a review of their experience and qualifications, the characteristics described in the preceding paragraph, the Committee focused on public company experience. The Committee selected a previously identified candidate for further considerationnumber of candidates to be interviewed. As is the Company’s practice, the
Committee, together with our Lead Director and interviews and at the endBoard’s Chairman, interviewed each of the process was pleased to recommend Laurence M. Downes for electioncandidates and unanimously recommended Ms. Lancaster to the Board at this Annual Meeting. Mr. Downesentire Board. In recommending Ms. Lancaster, the Committee
noted in particular Ms. Lancaster’s industry
knowledge and investment banking experience.
Ms. Lancaster was first camebrought to the attention of the Committee as a recommendation fromby the Board’s Chairman.Chairman following discussions with one of the Company’s outside advisors.
As discussed previously, both Mr. Cohen and Mr. Intrieri were nominated by Corvex for election to our Board, along with two additional nominees. The Board’s Chairman, our Lead Director and Ms. Hawes (a member of our Governance and Nominations Committee not up for election in 2018) interviewed each of the Corvex nominees, including Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri, although Ms.Hawes was not able to participate in Mr. Intrieri’s interview. In connection with the letter agreement entered into with Corvex, the Board’s Chairman, our Lead Director and Ms. Hawes reviewed the results of their interviews with the Board, and the Board appointed Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri to the Board and approved the nomination of all of the Board’s nominees for election as Directors at the Annual Meeting.
Our Governance and Nominations Committee has not adopted a policy or procedure for the consideration of Director candidates
recommended by shareholders. Our Board does not recall an instance in which a shareholder (other than a shareholder serving as an officer or Director) has recommended a Director candidate; however, asAs stated in prior years, the Governance and Nominations Committee will consider timely shareholder recommendations.recommendations, but has not received any such shareholder recommendations in the past. In the event we received a shareholder recommendation of a candidate for director, that recommendation would be shared with our Governance and Nominations Committee, which does not require a formal policy or process. Our Company BylawsBy Laws contain detailed procedures for shareholders desiring to nominate, instead of recommend, a Director candidate. For this Annual Meeting, the Governance and Nominations Committee did not receive any Director candidate recommendations from shareholders holding at least 5% of our common stock.stock other than the director nominees put forth by Corvex.
BOARDAND COMMITTEESCORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In 2016, our Board held 12 meetingsEnergen is committed to maintaining strong corporate governance principles and committees of the Board held 13 meetings. Each Director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which the Director served during 2016. We encourage and expect our Board members to attend our Annual Meeting absent extenuating circumstances, but we do not have a formal policy requiring attendance. Allpractices. This section of our Board members attended our Annual Meeting held in 2016.
Our Board has the following three committees, each with a written charter adopted by the Board and available on our website:
The following table summarizes the primary purpose and function of each committee.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The table below provides membership and meetingProxy Statement contains information for each of the standing Board committees for 2016.
Name | Audit | Compensation | Governance & Nominations | |||
Dewey* | C | M | ||||
Goodrich* | M | C | ||||
Gorrie* | M | M | ||||
Grinney*(b) | M | C | ||||
Hargett* | M | |||||
Hawes* | M | M | ||||
Kleier* | M | |||||
McManus (a) | ||||||
Snider*(b) | M | M | ||||
Youngblood*(c) | M | |||||
2016 Meetings | 5 | 6 | 2 |
C: Chair M: Member *Independent Director
INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS; RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our Board of Directors has adopted independence standards consistent with the listing standards adopted by the NYSE. A Director will be considered “independent” and found to have no material relationship with the Company if:
(1) During the prior three years:
and
In February 2017, the Board of Directors reviewed the independence of its members and Mr. Downes under the independence standards set forth above. The independence review did not identify any transactions, relationships or arrangements for consideration by the Board and the Board determined that, with the exception of Mr. McManus, each of the current Directors and Mr. Downes is independent of the Company. Mr. McManus is not considered an independent Director due to his employment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence standards required by applicable SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards, and the financial literacy and accounting or financial management requirements of the NYSE listing standards. The Board has also determined that Ms. Hawes is an audit committee financial expert under the rules and regulations of the SEC.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominations Committee meets the independence requirements of applicable SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards.
Although the Company does not have specific policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of Company transactions in which
any Director, executive officer or other related person will have a direct or indirect material interest, the Company does have conflict of interest disclosure requirements in its Business Conduct Guidelines and its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Business Conduct Guidelines require each officer, employee and Director to notify the Company if he/she or a close family member has a financial interest in a transaction involving the Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines further provide that Directors are expected to disclose to the Board any potential conflicts of interest that they may have with respect to any matters under discussion and refrain from voting on such matters, if appropriate.
We rely on our Directors and executive officers to make advance disclosure to the Board of
Directors of transactions with the Company in which a Director or an executive officer will have a direct or indirect interest. Our Board of Directors would then evaluate and determine whether to approve any such proposed transaction. Failure to disclose such a transaction toabout our Board of Directors, in advanceBoard committees and to seek approval from our Board prior to engaging in such a transaction would constitute a violation of our Company’s Business Conduct Guidelines. Our Directorsgovernance structure and executive officers also complete an annual questionnaire that identifies or confirms the absence of any direct or indirect participation in any transaction with the Company.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTUREAND ROLEIN RISK OVERSIGHT
The Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors is Mr. McManus, who also serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. This combined Chairman-CEO leadership role has been used by the Company for many years except during brief succession transition periods. The Company has also always had a majority independent Board membership. Currently, Mr. McManus is the only non-independent member of the Board. Underpolicies. Additional information about our Corporate Governance Guidelines our Board designates a Lead Director for purposes of convening and chairing meetings of our non-management Directors. The role of Lead Director is currently filled by Mr. Goodrich. Effective May 1, 2017, Mr. Dewey will succeed Mr. Goodrich as Lead Director. Based on many years of experience, the Board believes that this structure serves the Company well in providing
effective and efficient leadership with active independent oversight.
The Board exercises its risk oversight role through Board and Committee meetings. The Board has developed a matrix identifying key risks and specifying full Board or specific Committee oversight responsibility. The Governance and Nominations Committee is charged with coordinating periodic review, update and assessment of the matrix. As noted above, a majority of the Board members and all Committee members are independent. Risk oversight matters are discussed and reviewed in various ways: normal agenda items; presentations in response to Director requests; presentations initiated by management; and issues raised and discussed during the course of Board and Committee meetings.
COMMUNICATIONWITHTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS
Based on past experience, we expect to receive and respond to shareholder communications in a variety of ways. Our Board does not want to limit this flexibility and has not implemented a defined process for shareholders to send communications to the Board. Any shareholder or other interested person wishing to
communicate with a member of the Board may send correspondence to his or her attention at Energen Corporation, 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707. The names, titles and committee assignments of our officers and Directors, together with our mailing address and telephone number,governance practices can be
found on our website atwww.energen.com under the heading “Investor Relations” and subheading “Corporate Governance” (www.energen.com). Also under that subheading, page 16 of our Business Conduct Guidelines details the procedure adopted by our Audit Committee for the handling
of inquiries and correspondence relating to errors, deficiencies and misrepresentations in accounting, internal control, and audit related matters. Such inquiries and correspondence are to be forwarded by our General Counsel to the Chairman of our Audit Committee.
The Company has a code of ethics, titled Business Conduct Guidelines, which is applicable to all of the Company’s employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Business Conduct Guidelines are also applicable to all of the
Directors of the Company. We intend to post amendments to or waivers from the Business Conduct Guidelines that are applicable to the Company’s Directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer on our website.
AVAILABILITYOFCORPORATE GOVERNANCE DGOCUMENTSUIDELINES.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth important principles for our Board’s corporate governance practices and guide our Board in carrying out its responsibilities to the Company and our shareholders. Our Governance and Nominations Committee reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines from time to time to consider the need for any modifications or amendments, which are then reviewed and approved by our Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address our Board’s role, leadership and size, identification and selection of new Director nominees, independence, qualifications, confidentiality, self-evaluation, stock ownership and access to management and advisors.
Our corporate governance documents are all available on our website under the heading “Investor Relations” and subheading “Corporate
Governance” (www.energen.com). Our corporate governance documents include the following:
Shareholders also may obtain copies of these documents from us without charge by requesting such documents in writing or by telephone at the following address or telephone number:
Energen Corporation
Attn:ATTN: Corporate Secretary
605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707
Phone:Telephone: (205)326-2700
The Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors is Mr. McManus, who also serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. This combinedChairman-CEO leadership role has been used by the Company for many years except during brief succession transition periods. The Company has also always had a majority independent Board membership. Currently, Mr. McManus is the onlynon-independent member of the Board.
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board is required to designate a Lead Director if the Board does not have an independent Chairman. The Lead Director serves as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors.
The Responsibilities of the Lead Director include:
The role of Lead Director is currently filled by
Mr. Dewey. Based on many years of experience, the Board believes that this structure serves the Company well in providing effective and efficient leadership with active independent oversight.
The Board exercises its risk oversight role through Board and Committee meetings. The Board has developed a matrix identifying key risks and specifying full Board or specific Committee oversight responsibility. The
Governance and Nominations Committee is charged with coordinating periodic review, update and assessment of the matrix. The full Board or Board committees are responsible for the following areas of risk oversight:
Board or Board Committee | Risk Oversight Focus | |
Full Board | Strategic risks, including: • Industry, political and economic trends • Growth, acquisition and development • Shareholder relations Financial risks, including: • Commodity prices • Hedging strategy • Liquidity and credit access • Reserve estimates and development Operational risks, including: • Drilling and development plans • Geographic concentration • Safety/Regulatory compliance • Cybersecurity | |
Audit Committee | Financial risks, including: • Hedging counterparty exposure • Customer credit concentration • Impairment • Reserve estimates and development (shared with full Board) • Accounting, auditing and reporting matters Operational Risks, including: • Regulatory compliance • Litigation • Insurance |
Board or Board Committee | Risk Oversight Focus | |
Compensation Committee | Operational Risks, including: • Executive talent, succession planning and compensation • Regulatory compliance | |
Governance and Nominations Committee | Regulatory compliance Risk oversight responsibilities |
Although each committee oversees a different area of risk, all committees report to the Board about these risks. These reports provide a basis for coordination of risk oversight between our Board and Company management.
As noted above, all members of the Board other than Mr. McManus and all Committee members
are independent. Risk oversight matters are discussed and reviewed in various ways: normal agenda items; presentations in response to Director requests; presentations initiated by management; and issues raised and discussed during the course of Board and Committee meetings.
In 2017, our Board held 12 meetings and committees of the Board held 15 meetings. Each Director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which the Director served during 2017. We encourage and expect our Board members to attend our Annual Meeting absent extenuating circumstances, but we do not have a formal policy requiring attendance. All of our Board members then serving as Directors attended our Annual Meeting held in 2017.
Our Board has the following three committees, each with a written charter adopted by the Board and available on our website:
The following table summarizes the primary purpose and function of each committee.
Committee | Primary Purpose and Function | |
Audit | Responsibilities include: • assisting the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors; • appointment, compensation, retention, discharge and replacement of the Company’s independent auditors; • pre-approval of all services performed by the Company’s independent auditors; • review of effectiveness of the Company’s internal control procedures; • oversight of services provided by the Company’s independent auditors in connection with assessment of independence and performance of auditors; • discussion of Company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; and |
Committee | Primary Purpose and Function | |
• preparation of a Committee report as required by the SEC to be included in the Company’s annual Proxy Statement. All members of the Audit Committee are independent directors consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, applicable SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards and all members satisfy the financial literacy, accounting or financial management requirements of the NYSE listing standards. The Board has determined that Ms. Hawes is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. | ||
Compensation | Responsibilities include: • on an annual basis, review of, and recommendations to the Board concerning, compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers, including base salary, short and long-term cash and equity compensation, retirement compensation and benefits; • review and approval of corporate goals and objectives applicable to the compensation of the Company’s CEO; • evaluation of the Company CEO’s performance and achievement with respect to established corporate goals and objectives; • together with all independent directors, determine and approve the Company CEO’s compensation; • approval of compensation for the Company’s executive officers, including base salary, annual incentive programs and awards under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans; • succession planning for the position of CEO; • oversight of the administration of all of the Company’s equity-based compensation plans; • approval and monitoring of the Company’s stock ownership guidelines; and • production of an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable regulatory and listing standards. | |
Governance and Nominations | Responsibilities include: • oversight of the Company’s corporate governance structure, including review and suggestion of updates to the Company’s corporate governance principles and guidelines, Board procedures, and Board committee functions and charters; • review of potential Board candidates and recommendation of Director nominations to the Board; and • review of and making recommendations regardingnon-employee Director compensation to the Board. All members of the Governance and Nominations Committee are independent directors consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable regulatory and listing standards. |
The table below provides membership and meeting information for each of the standing Board committees for 2017. Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri were appointed to the Board on March 6, 2018. Also on that date, Mr. Cohen was appointed to the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Intrieri was appointed to the Audit Committee.
Name | Audit | Compensation | Governance & Nominations | |||
Dewey* | C | M | ||||
Downes*(c) | M | M | ||||
Goodrich*(b) | M | C(b) | ||||
Gorrie* | M | M | ||||
Grinney* | C | M | ||||
Hargett* | M | C(b) | ||||
Hawes* | M | M | ||||
Kleier* | M | M | ||||
Lancaster*(d) | M | |||||
McManus (a) | ||||||
Snider*(b) | M | M | ||||
2017 Meetings | 5 | 5 | 5 |
C: Chair M: Member *Independent Director
(a) | Mr. McManus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not a member of any Committee. |
(b) | Messrs. Goodrich and Snider retired from the Board effective May 3, 2017. Mr. Hargett succeeded Mr. Goodrich as Chair of the Governance and Nominations Committee effective May 3, 2017. |
(c) | Mr. Downes was elected to the Board on May 3, 2017. |
(d) | Ms. Lancaster was appointed to the Board effective July 21, 2017. |
INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS; RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our Board of Directors has adopted independence standards consistent with the listing standards adopted by the NYSE. A Director will be considered “independent” and found to have no material relationship with the Company if:
(1) During the prior three years:
in direct compensation from the Company other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of direct compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on future service); |
The Director has not been an executive officer or employee, and no immediate family member of the Director has been
an executive officer, of a company that made payments to or received payments from the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; |
and
(2) • | The Director is not a current partner or employee of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor; |
In February 2018, the Board of Directors reviewed the independence of its sitting members under the independence standards set forth above. The independence review did not identify any transactions, relationships or arrangements for consideration by the Board and the Board determined that, with the exception of Mr. McManus, each of the then current Directors is independent of the Company. On March 6, 2018, the Board of
Directors reviewed the independence of Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri under the independence standards set forth above and determined that each of Messrs. Cohen and Intrieri is independent of the Company. Mr. McManus is not considered an independent Director due to his employment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
All members of the Company’s Audit Compensation and Governance and Nominations Committees are independent directors under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable regulatory and listing standards. The Board and each Committee undertake an annual
self-evaluation of performance, with the Governance and Nominations Committee overseeing the process.
Related Party Transactions; Conflicts of Interest
Although the Company does not have specific policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of Company transactions in which any Director, executive officer or other related person will have a direct or indirect material interest, the Company does have conflict of interest disclosure requirements in its Business Conduct Guidelines and its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Business Conduct Guidelines require each officer, employee and Director to notify the Company if he/she or a close family member has a financial interest in a transaction involving the Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines further provide that Directors are expected to avoid any action, position or interest that would conflict with the interests of the Company or would give the appearance of a conflict. Directors are required to disclose all facts regarding a potential conflict to the Chairman of the Governance and Nominations Committee. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors with material conflicts that cannot be resolved should resign from the Board. If a Director has a personal interest in any matters under discussion, the Director is required to disclose such interest, recuse himself or herself from discussion and refrain from voting on such matters, if appropriate.
We rely on our Directors and executive officers to make advance disclosure to the Board of Directors of transactions with the Company in which a Director or an executive officer will have a direct or indirect interest. Our Board of Directors would then evaluate and determine whether to approve any such proposed transaction. Failure to disclose such a transaction to our Board of Directors in advance and to seek approval from our Board prior to engaging in such a transaction would constitute a violation of our Company’s Business Conduct Guidelines and Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Directors and executive officers also complete an annual questionnaire that identifies or confirms the absence of any direct or indirect participation in any transaction with the Company.
COMMUNICATIONWITHTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS
Based on past experience, we expect to receive and respond to shareholder communications in a variety of ways. Our Board does not want to limit this flexibility and has not implemented a defined process for shareholders to send communications to the Board. Any shareholder or other interested person wishing to communicate with a member of the Board may send correspondence to his or her attention at Energen Corporation, 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707. The names, titles and committee assignments of our officers and Directors, together with our
mailing address and telephone number, can be found on our website under the heading “Investor Relations” and subheading “Corporate Governance” (www.energen.com). Also under that subheading, page 16 of our Business Conduct Guidelines details the procedure adopted by our Audit Committee for the handling of inquiries and correspondence relating to errors, deficiencies and misrepresentations in accounting, internal control, and audit related matters. Such inquiries and correspondence are to be forwarded by our General Counsel to the Chairman of our Audit Committee.
The Company has a code of ethics, titled Business Conduct Guidelines, which is applicable to all of the Company’s employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Business Conduct Guidelines are also applicable to all of the
Directors of the Company. We intend to post amendments to or waivers from the Business Conduct Guidelines that are applicable to the Company’s Directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer on our website.
RESTRICTIONSON CERTAIN TYPESOF TRANSACTIONS
Company policy prohibits Directors and officers from engaging in the following types of transactions with respect to Energen’s common
stock: hedging transactions; short sales; margin accounts; and pledging securities.
Confidentiality
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our Directors to comply with a detailed Board Confidentiality Policy. The policy requires Directors to only use confidential information obtained through their service as Directors for the benefit of the Company and not for their own personal benefit or the benefit of other persons or entities. Directors may not disclose confidential information to any other person or entity except with the written permission of the Company or the Chairman.
Stock Ownership
Eachnon-management Director is expected to hold, directly or indirectly, at least 5,000 shares
of Energen common stock. New Directors are expected to meet this ownership target within five years of joining the Board of Directors. Our CEO is expected to own Energen common stock with a valuation equal to or exceeding 5 times his base salary, while our other named executive officers are expected to hold Energen common stock with a valuation equal to or exceeding 2 or 3 times their base salary, depending on their position with the Company. Our other officers are also subject to stock ownership guidelines in multiples of base salary corresponding to their positions with the Company. Officers are prohibited from disposing of common stock (other than to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with vesting of equity awards or payment of the
purchase price of stock options) unless they have met such guidelines and would continue to meet such guidelines after such disposition.
Outside Director Compensation
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines indicate a strong preference that Directors refrain from accepting compensation from parties other than the Company in connection with their service on our Board. Any Director receiving such compensation is required to disclose the compensation arrangement to our Board.
Compensation Recoupment Policy
In the event our Board determines that fraud, illegal conduct, intentional conduct or gross negligence by a current or former officer of the Company was a significant contributing factor to a restatement of our financial statements, our Board may recoup from such officer an amount our Board deems appropriate. The recoupment policy is applicable to incentive compensation payable with respect to periods commencing, or having award or grant dates, on or after January 1, 2018. For more information regarding the adoption of our Compensation Recoupment Policy, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Policies and Practices” beginning on page 44 of this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE PROCESS
The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing and administering the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee establishes the salaries and other compensation of the executive officers of the Company, including the Chairman and CEO, the CFO, and other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. In setting salaries and granting other forms of compensation, the
Compensation Committee receives and considers information and recommendations from the CEO and the Vice President of– Administration. The Compensation Committee also reviews and considers reports and analysis provided by its executive compensation consultant, Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”). Pay Governance is engaged by
the Company at the direction of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee conducted an assessment of the independence of Pay Governance utilizing the
factors identified in Rule10C-1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Pay Governance did not identify any conflicts to be considered by the Compensation Committee as part of its independence analysis. Management meets with Pay Governance representatives and participates in most meetings between Pay Governance and the Compensation Committee. Pay Governance provides assessments of the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation levels and practices relative to relevant executive labor markets and other assignments as required by the Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee regularly meets in executive sessions without management present. For a more detailed description of the Compensation Committee’s authority and
interaction with management and Pay Governance, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2634 of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKSAND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
None of the Directors serving on the Compensation Committee has served as an officer or employee of the Company or had a relationship with the Company that required consideration by our Board of Directors in connection with their review of Director
independence. No executive officer of the Company has served or serves on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed or employs any member of the Compensation Committee.
2016 Director
Determining Directors’ Compensation
Onlynon-employee Directors are compensated for their service on the Board or any committee of the Board.
Name | Fees Earned Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c)(1) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | |||||||||||||
Dewey
|
| 88,500
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 186,503
|
| |||||||
Goodrich
|
| 76,500
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 174,503
|
| |||||||
Gorrie
|
| 72,000
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 170,003
|
| |||||||
Grinney
|
| 76,957
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 174,960
|
| |||||||
Hargett
|
| 70,500
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 168,503
|
| |||||||
Hawes
|
| 73,500
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 171,503
|
| |||||||
Kleier
|
| 70,500
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 168,503
|
| |||||||
Snider
|
| 80,043
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 178,046
|
| |||||||
Youngblood(2)
|
| 21,798
|
|
| 98,003
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
| 119,801
|
|
The Governance and Nominations Committee charter provides that:
At such times as it determines appropriate or as requested by the Board, the Committee will review and make recommendations with respect
to Director compensation. Such compensation is intended to be sufficient to attract and retain qualified candidates and may include a combination of cash and stock-based compensation.
Management discusses Director compensation withprovides information to the Governance and Nominations Committee and makes recommendations on Directorwith respect to current practices regarding director compensation that the Governance and Nominations Committee considers as part of its process in reviewing Director compensation.
Except as noted below, the current schedule of Director monthly cash retainer fees and meeting fees has been in effect since January 1, 2014. The 20162017 share awards were issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan. The Governance and Nominations Committee targeted a grant of shares that would equal approximately $100,000 in value to eachnon-employee Director based on share prices during the first ten trading days of January 2016.2017.
Non-employee Director Fees.Fees
Chair: $22,500 per year |
Member: $10,500 per year |
Chair: $16,000 per year |
Member: $6,000 per year |
Chair: $7,500 per year |
Member: $4,500 per year |
No2017, Lead Director who is an employee of the Company is compensated for service as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors.
Share Awards and Deferred Compensation.Compensation
Our Board has authority to make compensatory grants of stock, restricted stock and stock options tonon-employee Directors pursuant to
the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan at such times and in such amounts as the Board may determine. Awards under the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan are in addition to the payment of monthly cash retainers and meeting fees. The plan also allows eachnon-employee Director to elect to have any part or all of the cash fees payable for services as a Director of the Company and its subsidiaries paid in shares of common stock.
The Governance and Nominations Committee administers the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan. Although the plan has no fixed duration, the Board of Directors or our shareholders may terminate the plan. Our Board of Directors also may amend the plan from time to time, but any amendment that materially increases the benefits accruing to participants, increases the number of shares of common stock that may be issued or materially modifies eligibility requirements would require the approval of our shareholders.
Under the Company’s 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan, members of the Board of Directors may elect to defer part or all of their Director compensation. Messrs. Dewey, Downes, Grinney, Kleier and Ms. Hawes deferred portions of their Director compensation during 2017. The number of deferred share equivalents held by each Director under the 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan is disclosed in the table below under the caption “Share Ownership – Directors and Executive Officers.” The 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan is discussed below in greater detail under the
caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan.”
Stock Ownership Guideline.The stock ownership expectation ofnon-employee Directors is 5,000 shares, including share equivalents under the 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan. New Directors are expected to reach this ownership target within five years of joining the Board of Directors. Each Director, other than Ms. Lancaster, who was appointed to the Board effective July 21, 2017, currently holds more than 5,000 shares,
including share equivalents under the 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan.
Other. The Company reimburses Directors for travel, lodging, and related expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings. These reimbursements include the expenses incurred by the Directors’ spouses in accompanying the Directors at the invitation of the Company, along with taxes related to such payments. The Company did not hold a Board retreat during 2017, and no expenses were incurred or reimbursed for spousal travel.
The following table summarizes the compensation received by eachnon-employee Director serving on the Board in respect of 2017:
2017 Director Compensation
Name | Fees Earned Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c)(1) | (g) | (h) | ||||||||||||
Dewey
|
| 108,500
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 201,530
|
| ||||
Downes(2)
|
| 52,137
|
|
| -
|
|
| -
|
|
| 52,137
|
| ||||
Goodrich(3)
|
| 24,275
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 117,305
|
| ||||
Gorrie
|
| 74,500
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 167,530
|
| ||||
Grinney
|
| 82,496
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 175,526
|
| ||||
Hargett
|
| 74,000
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 167,030
|
| ||||
Hawes
|
| 73,500
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 166,530
|
| ||||
Kleier
|
| 72,000
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 165,030
|
| ||||
Lancaster(2)
|
| 30,444
|
|
| -
|
|
| -
|
|
| 30,444
|
| ||||
Snider(3)
|
| 22,275
|
|
| 93,030
|
|
| -
|
|
| 115,305
|
|
(1) | The Stock Awards in column (c) reflect the January 2017 grant of 1,750 shares under the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan with a grant date value of $53.16 per share. There were no stock awards outstanding atyear-end. |
(2) | Mr. Downes was elected to the Board effective May 3, 2017, and Ms. Lancaster was appointed to the Board effective July 21, 2017. |
(3) | Messrs. Goodrich and Snider retired from the Board effective May 3, 2017. |
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has selected the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company with respect to its operations for the year 2017.2018 fiscal year. While shareholder ratification of the appointment is not required, the Audit Committee has determined to seek input from the shareholders as part of the selection process. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for a number ofthirty-six years. If the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not ratified by the shareholders, the matter of the
appointment of an independent registered public
accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee.
The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP audited our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2017, and the Audit Committee plans to continue the services of this firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2018. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The following table presents fees billed or expected to be billed for professional audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, and fees billed for other services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during those periods.periods:
2016 | 2015 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
(1) Audit fees | $1,292,000 | $1,448,000 | $1,396,000 | $1,292,000 | ||||||||||||
(2) Audit-related fees(a) | $87,000 | $253,000 | ||||||||||||||
(3) Tax fees(b) | $96,000 | $205,000 | ||||||||||||||
(2) Audit-related fees (a) | $55,000 | $87,000 | ||||||||||||||
(3) Tax fees (b) | $171,000 | $96,000 | ||||||||||||||
(4) All other fees | $0 | $0 | $1,000 | $0 |
(a) | Includes fees for |
(b) | Includes fees incurred in connection with the Company’s tax returns and review of certain tax matters. |
Our Audit Committee approved, directly or through ourpre-approval process, one hundred percent (100%) of the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2016,2017, and concluded that the provision of such services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.
Our Audit Committeepre-approved the engagement through June 30, 20172018 of the
independent auditors with respect to the following services: (i) services necessary to
perform the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) audit-related services such as employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, accounting assistance and internal control reviews; and (iii) tax services including preparation and/or review of, and consultation and advice with respect to, tax returns and reports; claims for tax refund; tax planning services; tax implications of changes in
accounting methods and applications for approval of such changes; tax basis studies; tax implications of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; tax issues relating to payroll; tax
issues relating to employee benefit plans; requests for technical advice from tax authorities and tax audits and appeals (not including representation before a tax court, district court or federal court of claims or a
comparable state or local court). In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee has been
delegated the authority by the Audit Committee topre-approve the engagement of the independent auditors for services not covered by the above authority. All suchpre-approvals must be reported to the Audit Committee at the next committee meeting.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy by shareholders entitled to vote on the matter is required to ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
2016 AUDIT2017AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent Director as determined by the Board of Directors, based on the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC regulations. The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Hawes meets the criteria for “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined by SEC rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that all Audit Committee members satisfy the financial literacy, accounting or financial management requirements of the NYSE listing standards. In compliance with the requirements of the NYSE, the Audit Committee has a formal written charter approved by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is available on our website under the heading “Investor Relations” and subheading “Corporate Governance” (www.energen.com). InThe Audit Committee has the responsibilities set forth in its charter, including:
Management of the Company has primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal financial controls, for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, for preparing the financial statements and for the public reporting process. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements and assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
In its responsibility under its charter,role of financial reporting oversight, the Audit Committee has:
The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers required by PCAOB Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,“ and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers its independence from the auditorsCompany and its management. In this regard, the auditors’ independence;Audit Committee has considered whether the provision to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers of limitednon-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers. The Audit Committee has satisfied itself as to the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
As part of its auditor engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent audit firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers and
Based on the considerations referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to theour Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KConsolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 20162017 be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee has also considered whether2017 and selected PricewaterhouseCoopers as the independent registered public accountants’ provision of non-audit services toaccounting firm for the Company is compatible with maintaining their independence.for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Kenneth W. Dewey, Chair
Laurence M. Downes
M. James Gorrie
Jay Grinney
William G. Hargett
Frances Powell Hawes
Alan A. Kleier
Lori A. Lancaster
The only persons known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the Company’s common stock are the following:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned(1) | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned(1) | ||||
Boston Partners(2) One Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 | 8,995,989 | 9.27% | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(3) 270 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 | 9,174,996 | 9.4% | ||||||
Wellington Management Group LLP(4) c/o Wellington Management Company LLP 280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210 | 6,448,781 | 6.64% | ||||||
Corvex Management LP(2) 667 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10065 | 9,710,474 | 9.9% | ||||||
Boston Partners(3) One Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 | 7,309,942 | 7.52% | ||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(4) 270 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 | 8,944,197 | 9.2% | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(5) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 8,944,318 | 9.2% | 8,569,116 | 8.8% | ||||
The Vanguard Group(6) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 8,691,265 | 8.95% | 8,203,919 | 8.44% |
(1) |
(2) | In a Schedule |
(3) | In a Schedule 13G filed February 12, 2018, Boston Partners reported having sole power to vote 6,204,584 shares of common stock, shared power to vote 9,974 shares of common stock and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 7,309,942 shares of common stock. All information in this footnote was obtained from the Schedule 13G filed by Boston Partners. |
In a Schedule 13G filed January |
(5) | In a Schedule 13G filed January 24, |
(6) | In a Schedule 13G filed February 9, |
DIRECTORSAND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As of February 28, 2017,2018, our Directors and executive officers beneficially owned shares of our common stock as described in the table below. Beneficial ownership includes shares that each person has the right to acquire within sixty (60) days of February 28, 2017.2018. Except as we have noted below, each individual listed below has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to shares they beneficially own, and has not pledged any of their shares of our common stock. Company policy prohibits our officers and Directors from pledging our common stock or trading in derivatives of our common stock.
Name of Entity, Individual or Persons in Group | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned(2) | Share Under Deferred Plan | Restricted Stock Units (4) | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class Beneficially Owned(2) | Share Under Deferred Plan | Restricted Stock Units (4) | ||||||||
Jonathan Z. Cohen | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Kenneth W. Dewey | 15,000 | * | 29,999 | - | 15,000 | * | 33,840 | - | ||||||||
Laurence M. Downes | 5,025 | * | - | - | 5,025 | * | 2,930 | - | ||||||||
David Godsey | 32,742 | * | 264 | 16,397 | 43,629 | * | 264 | 15,180 | ||||||||
T. Michael Goodrich | 47,572 | * | - | - | ||||||||||||
M. James Gorrie | 9,650 | * | - | - | 11,370 | * | - | - | ||||||||
Jay Grinney | 2,500 | * | 16,323 | - | 2,500 | * | 19,566 | - | ||||||||
William G. Hargett | 6,080 | * | - | - | 7,800 | * | - | - | ||||||||
Frances Powell Hawes | 2,990 | * | 6,701 | - | 2,990 | * | 8,422 | - | ||||||||
Vincent J. Intrieri | 10,500 | * | - | - | ||||||||||||
Alan A. Kleier | 1,000 | * | 4,580 | - | 2,000 | * | 6,301 | - | ||||||||
Lori A. Lancaster | 1,000 | * | 1,720 | - | ||||||||||||
James T. McManus, II | 347,340 | * | - | 125,107 | 408,376 | * | - | 115,794 | ||||||||
Charles W. Porter, Jr. | 89,369 | * | 948 | 51,017 | 109,832 | * | 948 | 47,195 | ||||||||
John S. Richardson | 194,273 | * | 500 | 56,199 | 192,013 | * | 400 | 51,993 | ||||||||
Stephen A. Snider | 37,450 | * | 4,483 | - | ||||||||||||
J. David Woodruff | 174,559 | * | 831 | 23,802 | ||||||||||||
All Directors and executive officers (15 persons) | 974,532 | 1.00% | 66,499 | 276,523 | ||||||||||||
J. David Woodruff (5) | 168,851 | * | 831 | 23,802 | ||||||||||||
All Directors and executive officers (18 persons) | 1,022,301 | 1.05% | 76,787 | 279,293 |
* | Less than one percent. |
(1) | The shares of common stock shown above include shares owned by spouses and children, as well as shares held in trust. The shares of common stock shown above for Messrs. Godsey, McManus, Porter, Richardson, Woodruff and the other executive officers of the Company include shares that are held for their respective accounts under the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan. Messrs. Godsey, McManus, Porter, Richardson, Woodruff and all Directors and executive officers as a group hold presently exercisable options to acquire 10,164, 199,419, 51,763, |
(2) | The number and percentage of common stock beneficially owned does not include share equivalents under the Energen Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan or restricted stock units. |
(3) | Represents shares of common stock credited to Company Stock Accounts under the Energen Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan. The value of Company Stock Accounts tracks the performance of the common stock. The Company Stock Accounts have no voting rights. The number of securities granted under the Energen Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan is estimated based on the recordkeeper’s unit accounting. |
(4) | Represents shares of common stock issuable upon satisfaction of service period for restricted stock units. Restricted stock units have no voting rights. |
(5) | Mr. Woodruff’s restricted stock units vested upon his retirement; however, the shares of common stock will not be issued until six months after his retirement. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, Directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 within specified time frames with the SEC, and
to provide us with copies of all forms filed. We believe, based on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us, that, during fiscal 2016,2017, our executive officers, Directors and 10% shareholders complied in full with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Company demonstrated strong execution in 2017 driven byon-target drilling and completion costs per BOE and associated significant increases in oil and gas production. Despite a rising service cost environment, drilling and completion BOE targets were achieved due to superior performance of the Company’s improved frac design. In addition, the Company’s continued focus on cost control resulted in solid performances inper-unit general and administrative expenses and production expenses. Our production (excluding acquisitions, divestitures and held for sale properties) was 27.8 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE) in 2017, or 35% greater than 2016 production of 20.6 MMBOE. Proved reserves of 444.0 MMBOE atyear-end 2017 increased 40% fromyear-end 2016 largely as a result of extensions and discoveries from our active drilling and completion program, improved frac design performance, and price and other positive revisions.
Our executive compensation program is designed to reward performance and reflects the importance of our executive officers executing our business plans while focusing on key measures of profitability and the creation of
shareholder value. Our net income for 2017 was $306.8 million, including approximately $240.1 million associated with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, compared to a net loss of $(167.5 million) in 2016. Adjusted EBITDAX of approximately $657.4 million in 2017 was more than double our Adjusted EBITDAX for fiscal year 2016 of $293.2 million. See page 40 for a detail of the targets and results for each of the 2017 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan performance criteria.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the 2017 compensation program for our named executive officers and the philosophy and practices on which it is based.
Overview.Named Executive Officers.The following discussion details how the Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company(“Compensation Committee”) determines compensation for the Company’s Chairman and CEO, the CFO, and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (sometimes referred to as the “named executive officers” or the “NEOs”). The Company’s named executive officers in respect of 2017 were the following:
Name | Title | |
James T. McManus, II | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |
Charles W. Porter, Jr. | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
John S. Richardson | President and Chief Operating Officer of Energen Resources Corporation | |
David Godsey | Senior Vice President, Exploration and Geology of Energen Resources Corporation | |
J. David Woodruff | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHYAND PRACTICES
Pay for Performance Philosophy. The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to serve the Company and its shareholders by aligning executive compensation with shareholder interests and by encouraging and rewarding management initiatives that will benefit the Company, its shareholders and employees over the long term.
Specifically, the Company’s approach to executive compensation is guided by the following objectives:
◾ | attract and retain highly qualified executives; |
◾ | link a substantial portion of individual compensation to Company performance; and |
◾ | align the interests of executives with the long-term interests of shareholders. |
The Compensation Committee attempts to structure compensation packages for the named executive officers such that at target performance, a majority of an
officer’s
target compensation opportunity is delivered through incentive compensation, with a majority of the total target incentive compensation opportunity delivered through long-term incentive compensation. As shown in the chart below, a majority of our named
executive officers’ 2017 target compensation opportunities was delivered through incentive compensation and a majority of the incentive compensation was delivered through long-term equity incentive compensation. The portion of an executive’s total compensation opportunity that is delivered through incentive compensation increases with position seniority since we believe that the compensation of our most senior executives should be linked most closely to Company performance.
The Company’s executive compensation program includes base salary, annual cash incentive awards, long-term equity-based incentive opportunities and retirement benefits. In the case of a change in control, we also provide severance compensation for qualified terminations related to the change in control. In order to retain certain key executives, we also provide for severance compensation in certain circumstances for each of Messrs. McManus, Porter, Richardson and Godsey. The Compensation Committee utilizes competitive data provided bybelieves that each of these components is a factor in the Company’s independent compensation consultant, input from the Chief Executive Officer regarding the performanceattraction, retention and motivation of named executive officers other than himself, and consideration of internal equity to set total compensation ranges for each executive position and allocate compensation among salary,qualified executives. The annual incentivescash and long-term incentives. equity incentives link each executive’s compensation to corporate performance, with the annual cash incentives keyed to short-term financial and operational objectives and the long-term equity incentives providing alignment with shareholder returns.
The combination of salary, short-term incentivescash and long-term equity incentives is intended to compensate Company executives at approximately the 50th percentile of the market when the Company performs at a target level.level;
above median when the Company performs above target; and below median for below-target performance. Target performance represents the performance expectations of the Compensation Committee as measured by the performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the relative total shareholder return performance target associated with our use of long-term performance shares. The allocation between the various elements of the compensation package is intended to emphasize incentive compensation while remaining in line with market allocations for similar positions in comparable companies.
The Compensation Committee utilizes competitive data provided by the Company’s independent compensation consultant and input from the Chief Executive Officer regarding the performance of named executive officers other than himself to set total compensation ranges for each executive position and allocate compensation among salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives.
Compensation Practices.Energen’s executive compensation policies and practices include the following best practice features designed to align
compensation with performance and the long- termlong-term interests of shareholders.
| ||
✓ ✓ Performance goals are quantifiable,
✓ Long-term incentives 100% equity-based
✓ Majority of long-term incentives
✓ Long-term incentive performance measured against total shareholder return peer groups
✓
✓ Stock ownership guidelines for Executives and Directors
✓ Recoupment policy for officer compensation ✓Annual “Say on Pay” vote
✓ Limited perquisites
✓ ✓ Transition away from defined benefit plans ✓ The maximum payout under annual incentive awards is capped ✓ Mitigating risk and promoting long-term growth by determining award payouts based on a wide range of performance goals |
× Excise taxgross-up on
× Hedging of Energen
× Pledging of Energen |
Company Performance.During 2016, in response to challenging oil industry business conditions, the Company took aggressive steps to manage expenses and maintain its liquidity. Approximately $930 million was raised from an equity offering and the sale of non-core assets. As compared to the prior year, we reduced general and administrative expenses by approximately 36% and oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas production expenses by approximately 25%.
The Company had above target performance with respect to production, general and administrative expenses, lease operating expenses, drillbit finding and development costs, and safety. See page 32 for a detail of the targets and results for each of the 2016 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan performance criteria.
Base Salary. The Compensation Committee’s objective of targeting compensation for named executive officers at the 50th percentile of the market translates into salary ranges for executives intended to approximate the median salaries for comparable positions in our peer companies. When making salary adjustments within the target ranges, the Compensation Committee considers competitive salary data, recommendations from the CEO and the Vice President of Administration, internal comparability considerations and the executive’s experience, tenure, and performance.
Annual Cash Incentives and Company Performance. Payment of annual cash incentive compensation is linked to the annual performance of the Company and its subsidiaries through performance factors established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each year. For 2016, our actual performance relative to the applicable metrics established for our plan fell between target and
maximum. This result is reflected in the incentive payments described below.
Long-Term Equity Compensation. The Committee’s practice is to make annual grants of long-term equity incentives. In February 2017, as in recent years, the annual grant was a mix of performance shares (60%) and restricted awards (40%) (percentages indicate estimated value allocation).
Payout of performance shares is based on our total shareholder return performance relative to companies in the S&P Supercomposite Oil and Gas E&P Index. Performance shares have a three-year award measurement period. For the three-year award period ending December 31, 2016, the Company had a total shareholder return of -13%. Although negative, the return outperformed most of the companies in the index and placed the Company above the 80th percentile of the peer set. The operation of the plan is discussed in greater detail below.
The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to serve the Company and its shareholders by aligning executive compensation with shareholder interests and by encouraging and rewarding management initiatives that will benefit the Company, its shareholders and employees over the long-term. Specifically, the executive compensation program seeks to:
× Reloading, repricing or backdating options
× Granting stock options with an exercise price less than fair market value
× Providing excessive perquisites × Pay above market target compensation × Providing guaranteed or unearned bonuses × Allowing executives to participate in the determination of |
their own compensation |
The Company’s executive compensation program includes base salary, annual cash incentive awards, long-term equity-based incentive opportunities and retirement benefits. In the case of a change in control, we also provide severance compensation for qualified terminations related to the change in control.
The Compensation Committee believes that each of these components is a factor in the attraction, retention and motivation of qualified executives. The annual cash and long-term equity incentives link each executive’s compensation to corporate performance, with the annual cash incentives keyed to short-term financial and operational objectives and the long-term equity incentives providing alignment with shareholder returns.
The combination of salary, short-term cash and long-term equity incentives is intended to compensate Company executives at approximately the 50th percentile of the market when the Company performs at a target level; above median when the Company performs above target; and below median for below-target performance. Target performance represents the performance expectations of the Compensation Committee as measured by the
performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the relative total shareholder return performance target associated with our use of long-term performance shares. The allocation between the various elements of the compensation package is intended to emphasize incentive compensation while remaining in line with market allocations for similar positions in comparable companies. As shown in the chart below, a majority of 2016 target compensation was represented by incentive compensation and a majority of the incentive compensation was represented by long-term equity incentive compensation. The allocation to incentive compensation increases with position seniority since we believe that the compensation of our most senior executives should be linked most closely to Company performance.
ADMINISTRATIONOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ROLESAND RESPONSIBILITIES
RoleAuthority of the Compensation Committee:Committee. The Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors and meets regularly (five times in 2017), oversees and administers the Company’s executive compensation program. It establishes the salaries and other compensation of theall executive officers of the Company, including the named executive officers. On an annual basis, the Committee
conducts a performance evaluationsevaluation of the CEO
that includeincludes obtaining written input from each of the independent members of the Board of Directors. As noted below, the Committee then meets with the CEO to discuss his performance. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an independent Director.
Role of Management:Management.In evaluating compensation, the Compensation Committee receives and considers information and recommendations from the CEO and the Vice President of– Administration. On an annual basis,
the Compensation Committee meets with the CEO to discuss his performance and the CEO provides the Compensation Committee with his evaluation of the performance of the other executive officers in connection with the annual compensation review of those officers.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant:Consultant.The Compensation Committee also reviews and considers reports and analysis provided by its independent executive compensation consultant, Pay Governance. Pay Governance is engaged by the Company at the direction of the Compensation Committee.Committee, which has the sole authority to retain or dismiss its compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee determined Pay Governance to be independent following consideration of the factors identified in Rule10C-1(b)(4) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Management meets with Pay Governance representatives and participates in most meetings between Pay Governance and the Compensation Committee.
Pay Governance provides assessments of the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation levels and practices relative to relevant executive labor markets and other assignments as requested by the Compensation Committee. Specifically, during 2016,2017, Pay Governance assisted the Compensation Committee and the Company in the following areas:
◾ | providing information on general trends in executive compensation; |
◾ | providing prevalence and plan design information on various types of incentive plans; |
◾ | reviewing severance plan design and implementation; and |
◾ | providing compensation analyses of the competitiveness of the compensation of the Company’s executive positions, including an assessment of our pay and performance relative to |
Pay Governance does not make specific recommendations on individual pay levels, but rather provides competitive data for review and
use by the Compensation Committee and the Company. The Compensation Committee uses the Pay Governance-provided data and analysis for general reference purposes.
Each year, the Compensation Committee examines the competitive salary data provided by Pay Governance to determine base salary ranges for the Company’s executive officers, including the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews the market data provided by Pay Governance to assess the total compensation levels that would place Company executives at approximately the 50th50th percentile of the market, assuming the Company meets target performance objectives. In accordance with its practice in prior years, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation data and analyses provided by Pay Governance in setting 20162017 compensation. The information provided by Pay Governance utilized compensation data and analyses from two reference points: (1) Custom Peer Group – 2220 oil and gas companies and (2) Energy Sector – size adjusted companies from the 20142015 Energy Sector Mercer Total Compensation Survey. Companies included in the Custom Peer Group for 2017 data base are listed on Appendix A.
Importance of Shareholder Feedback.The Company values and carefully considers the feedback it receives from shareholders. At the 2017 Annual Meeting, the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation generated 96% of votes cast in favor of the Company’s executive compensation. As part of its 2018 executive compensation discussions, the Compensation Committee has not requested a listingreviewed the advisory vote result and considered it to be supportive of the companies selected by Pay Governance from the Mercer survey.Company’s compensation practices.
KEY C2016 COMPANYOMPENSATION PEERFORMANCELEMENTS
During 2016, the Company successfully responded to a challenging oil industry business environment. Oil prices, which had declined significantly during 2015, continued their decline
into 2016 with West Texas Intermediate trading in the mid-$20 range by February. The Company took aggressive steps to manage expenses and maintain its liquidity. We raised
approximately $380 million from an equity offering plus approximately $552 million from the sale of non-core assets. As compared to the prior year, we reduced general and administrative expenses by approximately 36% and reduced oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas production expenses by approximately 25%. We ended the year with a strong balance sheet, an attractive Permian Basin portfolio of properties, an active drillingCompany’s executive compensation program and 2016
reserve additions that replaced production by almost 300%.
The Company exceeded performance targets for production, general and administrative expenses, lease operating expenses, drillbit finding and development costs, and safety. See page 32 for a detailconsists of the targets and results for each of the 2016 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan performance criteria.following three primary components:
Component | Rationale | |
Base Salary | Customary, fixed element of compensation intended to attract and retain executives. Intended to approximate median salaries of similar positions in comparable companies in our industry. | |
Annual Cash Incentives | Holds executive officers accountable for the Company’s annual results by linking annual performance of the Company topre-determined performance factors established by the Compensation Committee. | |
Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation | Emphasizes long-term shareholder value creation through a combination of performance-based equity (performance shares) and time-based equity (restricted awards). |
As discussed above, the Compensation Committee attempts to provide competitive salaries. During 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed salary data intended to approximate the median salary of similar positions with comparable companies and it approved salary adjustments for 2016. In early 2016, however, in light of deteriorating oil and gas industry economic conditions, the Compensation Committee acted to hold base salaries at 2015 levels.2017. When reviewing salaries, the Compensation Committee considers competitive salary data, recommendations from the CEO and the Vice President of
– Administration, internal comparability considerations and the executive’s years of experience and performance.
The differences in amounts of compensation awarded to the named executive officers reflect differences in the competitive market data for the positions held by the executives as well as internal comparability. From an internal comparability perspective, Mr. McManus holds
For 2017, the position with the greatest corporate responsibilityannual base salary of each of our NEOs was increased by approximately 2.0% as a general merit increase based on Company and thus has the highest compensation among the named executive officers.individual performances.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (AICP). In order to link compensation to the Company’s annual performance, officers are eligible each year for cash incentive awards under the AICP. Awards are based upon attaining quantitative performance objectives approved by the Compensation Committee.
In March 2016,February 2017, the Compensation Committee established a baseline AICP performance hurdle for our named executive officers. In order to earn a cash incentive award under the AICP for the 20162017 fiscal year, Adjusted EBITDAX (defined below) for the 20162017 fiscal year must be equal to at least $50.0 million. If Adjusted EBITDAX was at least $50.0 million, the bonus pool would be funded at the maximum cash incentive level for each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion in
discretion in determining actual cash incentives using the objectives and performance factors set forth below, individual performance and such other matters as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. As defined by the Compensation Committee, “EBITDAX” means net income of the Company, plus interest, taxes, depreciation, accretion, impairment and exploration expenses. “Adjusted EBITDAX” means EBITDAX excluding the impact of (i) openmark-to-market gains and losses, (ii) changes in accounting principles or other provisions that materially affect reported results, (iii) gains or losses (net of severance payments) on asset dispositions with proceeds greater than $5 million, and (iv) EBITDAX on properties held for sale as of March 14, 2016,January 1, 2017, and/or sold properties with proceeds greater than $5 million for the fiscal year.
For 2016,2017, the maximum cash incentive opportunity was 200% of the named executive’s target incentive opportunity (expressed as a percentage of base salary).
Named Executive Officer | Target Incentive (as a % of salary) | |
McManus | 110% | |
Porter | 90% | |
Richardson | 90% | |
Godsey | 75% | |
Woodruff | 65% |
Upon satisfactionThe maximum cash incentive opportunity for each named executive officer was 200% of the AICP performance hurdle, the maximum individual cashofficer’s target incentive is calculated as follows:opportunity.
20162017 AICP Performance Hurdle. Adjusted EBITDAX for 20162017 equaled $300.2 million$657.4 (See “Non-GAAP“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” on Appendix B for explanation and reconciliation). Since the Company exceeded the AICP performance hurdle for the 20162017 fiscal year, the maximum cash incentive for each named executive officer was available for AICP cash incentive awards.
Following satisfaction of the AICP performance hurdle, the Compensation Committee calculates earned AICP incentives using the following formula –base salary xtarget incentive multiplier xperformance factor score +/+/- individual performance (if any). For purposes of determining the performance factor score for 2017, the Compensation Committee increased Adjusted EBITDAX by approximately $3.9 million to offset certain unbudgeted, unanticipated expenses of anon-operational nature. For example, Mr. McManus’s 20162017 AICP incentive was calculated as follows:
Calculation of McManus’s Actual AICP Incentive
Base Salary | X | Target Incentive Multiplier | X | Performance Factor Score | = | Actual Incentive | X | Target Incentive Multiplier | X | Performance Factor Score | = | Actual Incentive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$884,000 | X | 110% | X | 1.432 | = | $1,392,477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$902,000 | X | 110% | X | 1.459 | = | $1,447,620 |
Performance Factors and 20162017 Results:The Compensation Committee applied the performance targets and ranges shown below in determining final cash incentive payments under the AICP for each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee applies these additional performance factors for each named executive officer following satisfaction of the AICP performance hurdle as an exercise of the Compensation Committee’s negative discretion. Performance targets and ranges, as well as 20162017 results were as follows:
Performance Factor
| ||||||||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2016 Actual | |||||||
0.50 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.432 |
Performance Factor
| ||||||||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2017 Actual | |||||||
0.50 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.459 |
The performance factor scores were calculated based on the following criteria, results and weights:
Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2016 | 2016 Score | Weight | Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2017 | 2017 Score | Weight | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDAX (excluding certain unbudgetednon-operational expenses) | $459 Mil. | $575 Mil. | $746 Mil. | $661 Mil. | 1.50 | 30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Production (excluding acquisitions and divestitures and held for sale properties) MMBOE | 17.9 | 19.9 | 21.9 | 20.6 | 1.35 | 30% | 21.6 | 24.0 | 30.0 | 27.8 | 1.63 | 20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manage General & Administrative Expenses (excluding SERP, Pension & severances) | $98 | $89 | $80 | $87.4 | 1.18 | 30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Control base LOE (including M&T; excluding production and ad valorem taxes, acquisitions and divestitures and held for sale properties) | | $10.67 per BOE | | | $9.70 per BOE | | | $8.73 per BOE | | $7.86 | 2.00 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drillbit finding & development cost per BOE | | $9.00 per BOE | | | $7.50 per BOE | | | $6.00 per BOE | | $7.17 | 1.22 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling & Completion cost per BOE (for wells completed and placed into production during 2017, including wellhead equipment and excluding general facilities costs) | | $10.02 per BOE | | | $8.35 per BOE |
| | $6.68 per BOE | | | $8.37 per BOE |
| 0.99 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Control base LOE (including M&T; excluding production and ad valorem taxes, acquisitions and divestitures and held for sale properties) per BOE | | $8.66 per BOE | | | $7.87 per BOE | | | $5.90 per BOE | | | $6.61 per BOE |
| 1.64 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manage General & Administrative Expenses (excluding severances, if any) per BOE | | $4.04 per BOE |
| | $3.67 per BOE |
| | $2.75 per BOE |
| | $2.91 per BOE |
| 1.82 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Safety-Percentage of Industry Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DART Case Rate (20%) | 150% | 100% | 50% | 0.0% | 2.00 | 2% | 150% | 100% | 50% | 203% | 0 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lost Time Incidence Rate (20%) | 150% | 100% | 50% | 43.75% | 2.00 | 2% | 150% | 100% | 50% | 180% | 0 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency Rate (40%) | 150% | 100% | 50% | 0.0% | 2.00 | 4% | 150% | 100% | 50% | 33% | 2.00 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recordable Incident Rate (20%) | 150% | 100% | 50% | 71.43% | 1.57 | 2% | 150% | 100% | 50% | 90% | 1.20 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Weighted Score | 1.432 | 1.459 |
For performance levels falling between the values shown in the above table, payouts were determined by interpolation.
Based on the performance criteria and the 20162017 results detailed above, the named executive officers received AICP incentive payments in February 20172018 as reflected in the table below (also reflected in the column (g) 20162017 disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table). The table also reflects the maximum annual incentive amounts and the amounts that would have been paid to each named executive officer at target performance.
Named Executive Officer | AICP Target Annual Incentive ($) | AICP Maximum ($) | AICP Actual ($) | Actual as Percent of Target (%) | AICP Target Annual Incentive ($) | AICP Maximum ($) | AICP Actual ($) | Actual as Percent of Target (%) | ||||||||
McManus | 972,400 | 1,944,800 | 1,392,477 | 143% | 992,200 | 1,984,400 | 1,447,620 | 146% | ||||||||
Porter | 416,700 | 833,400 | 596,714 | 143% | 424,800 | 849,600 | 619,873 | 146% | ||||||||
Richardson | 459,000 | 918,000 | 657,288 | 143% | 468,000 | 936,000 | 682,812 | 146% | ||||||||
Godsey | 288,750 | 577,500 | 413,490 | 143% | 294,750 | 589,500 | 430,040 | 146% | ||||||||
Woodruff | 247,000 | 494,000 | 353,704 | 143% | 252,200 | 504,400 | 367,960 | 146% |
Discretionary Authority Applicable to Cash Incentive Awards.The Compensation Committee has the discretion to decrease an earned incentive by up to 100%. This discretion allows the Compensation Committee to reduce an individual payout for any reason, includingsub-standard individual performance. Such discretion was not utilized with respect to 20162017 AICP payments, other than by use of the performance factor score described above. The
The Compensation Committee’s negative discretion does not apply to plans other than the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
In addition to performance-based awards, the Board of Directors has the inherent authority, in its absolute discretion, to award cash bonuses tosuchto such employees and in such amounts as it determines. Such discretion was not utilized in 2016.2017.
LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plan is intended to align officer compensation with long-term company performance and changes in shareholder value. It provides for the grant of performance shares, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options. The Compensation Committee normally makes awards during its first meeting of the year. In 2016,2017, the Compensation Committee made awards during February and expects to continue making awards in February during future years. The Compensation Committee also retains the
authority to make awards at other times of the year.February. Equity grants for 20162017 are reflected in the table under “Executive Compensation – Grants of Plan-Based Awards” on page 41.49.
In 2016,2017, the Compensation Committee delivered long-term incentives using a combination of performance shares (representing 60% of each named executive officer’s target award opportunity) and restricted stock units (representing 40% of each named executive officer’s target award opportunity) providing a balanced program with measures that incentivize and reward relative performance as well as absolute performance.
The following table summarizes the 20162017 target equity award opportunity.opportunity for each named executive officer. Differences from the equity award values reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 3947 are due to:
20162017 Target Equity Incentive Opportunity and Equity Compensation Mix
Named Executive Officer | Target Long-Term Incentive Multiplier (as a multiple of salary) | Performance Shares as % of the Award | Restricted Stock Units as % of the Award | |||
McManus | 5.65 | 60 | 40 | |||
Porter | 4.40 | 60 | 40 | |||
Richardson | 4.40 | 60 | 40 | |||
Godsey | 1.70 | 60 | 40 | |||
Woodruff | 2.50 | 60 | 40 |
Named Executive Officer | Target Long-Term Incentive (as a multiple of salary) | |
McManus | 5.65 | |
Porter | 4.40 | |
Richardson | 4.40 | |
Godsey | 1.70 | |
Woodruff | 2.50 |
Performance Shares.A performance share is the value equivalentright to receive of one share of our common stock.stock at target performance. An award of performance shares becomes payable if the Compensation
Committee determines that all conditions of payment have been satisfied at the end of the applicable award period. The standard performance share award period is three years.
For example, the performance
shares granted in February 20162017 have an award period beginning January 1, 2016,2017, and ending December 31, 2018.2019. Payout of the performance shares, if any, will be based on Energen’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to companies (“peer companies”) included in the S&P Supercomposite Oil and Gas E&P index as constituted on the first day of the applicable award period.
The following table reflects 20162017 performance share award payout percentages at various performance levels:
Energen TSR Percentile Ranking Relative to S&P Supercomposite E&P Index | % of Performance Shares Payable | |||
90th or > | 200 | |||
50th | 100 | |||
25th | 25 | |||
Below 25th | 0 |
For performance levels falling between the values shown in the above table, percentages will be determined by interpolation. TSR will be measured in accordance with procedures established by the following rules:Compensation Committee.
Restricted Awards.The Stock Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of restricted stock and restricted stock units. No shares of restricted stock may be sold, and restricted stock units do not pay out, until the restrictions on such shares or units have lapsed or been removed. The Compensation Committee establishes the terms and conditions upon which the restrictions on each award shall lapse, which terms and conditions may include a required period of service or individual or corporate performance conditions. The restricted stock unit grants made in February 2016 have2017 vest on a three-year service period condition, vesting in February 2019. As described below under Changes for 2017, in February 2017, the Compensation Committee determined to move to ratable
vesting for restricted stock units,basis, with restrictions on the 2017 restricted stock unit grants lapsing in annualone-third increments as is common among our peers. The Committee expects to continue to use ratable vesting in future years.
Stock Options.The stock option provisions of the Stock Incentive Plan provide for the grant ofnon-qualified stock options, incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights or a combination thereof to officers and key employees, all as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee has not utilized the stock appreciation right feature in recent years, no
stock options have been granted since 2014 and all outstanding options have vested.
In addition to the three primary compensation components listed above, the Company’s executive compensation program also includes the following components:
NO EWNERSHIPXECUTIVE-ONLY WELFAREOR RETIREMENT BENEFITSOR TAX GUIDELINESROSS/A-UNTI-HEDGINGAND PLEDGINGPS
The Company has the following suggested stock ownership guidelines for officers: CEO and Chairman (McManus) – 5 times base salary; CFO (Porter), COO (Richardson), and General Counsel (Woodruff) – 3 times base salary; and
SVP (Godsey) – 2 times base salary. The Company’s other officers have ownership guidelines of 1 or 2 times base salary depending on position. For purposes of the guidelines, stock ownership includes (1) shares owned
directly by the executive and immediate family members, (2) shareholdings in the Company’s 401(k) plan, and (3) deferred compensation shares. It is expected that an officer will not sell or otherwise transfer shares of Company common stock if the officer does not meetprovide special welfare or retirement benefitsto its named executive officers. Instead, the ownership guidelines or if the sale or transfer would cause the officer to not meet the ownership guidelines, excepting shares sold or
withheld for taxes on equity awards. As of December 31, 2016, each of our named executive officers maintained ownership exceedingparticipate in the guidelines. In addition,broad-based employee benefit and welfare plans available to employees of the Company has policies that prohibit employeesgenerally. Further, in February 2017,
the Company eliminated legacy provisions in certain of its Severance Compensation Arrangements providing forgross-ups of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code and directors from hedgingno longer provides taxgross-ups on excise taxes or entering into pledging transactions utilizing Company common stock.perquisites to any of its executive officers.
1997 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Company also provides a program that allows our Directors and officers to defer receipt of compensation. Amounts deferred by a participant under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited to one of two separate accounts maintained for a participant, a Company stock account or an investment account. The value of a participant’s Company stock account tracks the performance of our common stock, including reinvestment of dividends (if any). At distribution, the participant’s Company stock account is payable in the form of shares of Company common stock. The value of a participant’s investment account tracks the performance of selected mutual funds offered by The Vanguard Group, Inc. All of the mutual funds utilized to track performance under the Deferred Compensation Plan are also investment options for employees under the Company’s generally available Employee Savings Plan. At distribution, the
participant’s investment account is payable in cash. The Deferred Compensation Plan is primarily designed as a financial planning and savings tool for participants. It does, however, include a Company contribution provision for officers that mirrors the Company match and supplemental contribution provisions of the Employee Savings Plan. The Company has established trusts and has funded the trusts, and presently plans to continue funding the trusts, in a manner that generally tracks participants’ accounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Although there is generally no requirement that the trusts be so funded or invested, if a change in control of the Company occurs, the trusts must be funded in an amount equal to the aggregate value of the participants’ accounts at the time of the change of control. While intended for payment of benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan, the trusts’ assets remain subject to the claims of our creditors.
ERETIREMENTXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTALEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
Energen previously had entered into Executive Retirement Supplement Agreements (“Supplemental Agreements”) with certain officers, including each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Godsey. In October 2014, our Board approved termination of the Supplemental Agreements as of December 31, 2014, and provided for distribution of the corresponding benefits in accordance with applicable law. Benefit accruals under the Supplemental Agreements (which were not subject to the payment restrictions under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) were paid as soon as practicable following termination of the Supplemental
Agreements. Benefit accruals that were subject to Code Section 409A could not be paid within 12 months of the date the Board of Directors took action to terminate the Supplemental Agreements (other than payments that would be payable under the terms of the Supplemental Agreements if the action to terminate had not occurred), but all such accruals had to be paid within 24 months of the same date.
Each of our named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Godsey, had sufficient service with the Company to have earned vested benefits under the Supplemental Agreements. The benefits paid during 2016 under the
Supplemental Agreements for each of the Company’s named executive officers are reflected in the table under “Executive Compensation – Pension Benefits in 2016.” No benefits remained to be paid at December 31, 2016. Each Supplemental Agreement provided that the employee would receive a supplemental retirement benefit equal to the difference between 60% of the employee’s monthly compensation and the employee’s monthly retirement benefit under the Energen
Corporation Retirement Income Plan (including Social Security benefit), which Retirement Income Plan was terminated effective January 31, 2015. An officer’s compensation would be determined based on a formula taking into account the average of the highest 36 consecutive months of base salary during the five years prior to severance plus the average of the three highest annual incentive awards for the ten full fiscal years prior to the earlier of (1) severance or (2) the officer’s 61st birthday.
SEVERANCE COMPENSATION AGREEMENTSAND CHANGEIN CONTROL
We have entered into Severance Compensation Agreements with certain officers including Messrs. McManus, Porter, Richardson, Woodruff and Godsey. We designed these agreementsIn order to retainbetter ensure the executives and provide continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in control of the Company. The agreements are “double-trigger” agreements meaning that benefits are payable only if a change in control occursand the executive’s employment is terminated or constructively terminated. Each agreement provides that if, during a base period following the occurrence of a change in control of the Company, the employee’s employment is terminated in a qualified termination, then we will pay the employee an amount equal to a percentage of the employee’s (a) annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, plus (b) the employee’s highest annual cash bonus compensation for the three fiscal years immediately prior to the fiscal year during which the change in control occurs.
Our Severance Compensation Agreements define a “change in control” as any of the following events:
For purposes of the Severance Compensation Agreements, (1) the term “qualified termination” means a termination (a) by the Company other than for cause or (b) by the employee for good reason, (2) the term “cause” generally means failure to substantially perform duties, misconduct injurious to the Company or conviction of a felony, and (3) the term “good reason” generally means a material diminution in the authority, duties, responsibilities, or benefits of the employee’s job.
Continuity of management and retention during transition periods is encouraged by providing severance benefits in the event of loss of employment following a change in control. The percentage payable and base period varies by executive and ranges from 100% with a one-year base period to 300% with a three-year base period. The 100%, 200% and 300% multiples reflect consideration of the executive’s level of corporate responsibility, specialized skills, and availability of other comparable job opportunities. Thus, officers with higher levels of corporate responsibility or specialized skill or knowledge may have higher multiples. Officers who, due to senior responsibilities or specialized skills, may have fewer comparable alternative employment opportunities also have higher multiples to provide compensation during a
longer job search. All named executive officers except Mr. Godsey have a 300% multiple and three-year base period. Mr. Godsey has a 200% multiple and two-year base period. The Severance Compensation Agreements also provide for the continuance of certain insurance and other employee benefits for a period of twenty-four months following any such termination of employment.
In February 2017, our Severance Compensation Agreements were amended to remove the Code Section 4999 excise tax gross-up provision that had remained in Severance Compensation Agreements entered into in 2007, including the Severance Compensation Agreements with Messrs. McManus, Porter, Richardson and Woodruff. Each of our Severance Compensation Agreements now includes a best net provision which reduces severance compensation if such reduction will result in a greater after tax value to the executive.
Our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan provides that upon a change in control and
termination of a participant’s employment, the participant will receive a pro rata incentive based on target performance and the number of days of employment during the Plan year.
The Company’s Stock Incentive Plan includes change in control provisions which, like the similar provisions in the Severance Agreements, are “double trigger” meaning that,executive leadership team in the event of a Company changepotentially disruptive corporate transaction, we have historically provided our executive officers, including the named executive officers, withchange-in-control severance protection. We believe that such protections, which are consistent with the practices of our peer companies, are in control, early vesting or payment occurs only ifthe best interest of our shareholders because they enable our executive leadership team to fully focus on the benefits of a corporate transaction for shareholders, rather than the potential adverse consequences of the transaction on their careers.
In 2017, we entered into agreements with our named executive officers to provide more limited severance protections in the event of a
qualifying termination of employment that is not in connection with a change in control occurscontrol.Pre-change-in-control severance protections are a common practice among our peer companies and are intended to promote retention of our executive officers by providing security in the executive’s employment is terminated or constructively terminated.event of a job loss.
For a descriptionadditional information about the terms of the potential benefits payable to the Company’sseverance arrangements with our named executive officers upon a termination or change in control effective as of December 31, 2016, refer to the discussion and tabular disclosure included under “Executiveamounts potentially payable thereunder, see ”Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change inIn Control” beginning on page 45.53.
COMPENSATION POLICIESAND PRACTICES
Compensation Recoupment Policy. Effective November 7, 2017, the Board adopted an officer compensation recoupment policy. The policy provides that if the Board determines that fraud, illegal conduct, intentional misconduct or gross neglect by a current or former officer of the Company was a significant contributing factor to a restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Board may recoup from the officer an amount that the Board deems appropriate. The policy is applicable to incentive compensation payable with respect to periods commencing, or having award or grant dates, on or after January 1, 2018. Recoupment shall be
made from applicable compensation through
one or more of the following actions: (a) requiring repayment by such officer to the Company of all or a portion of cash incentive payments made to, or on behalf of, the officer with respect to the most recent fiscal year for which such payments have been made as of the date of the Board’s recoupment decision; or (b) canceling all or a portion of such officer’s short-term and long-term incentive awards under the Company’s compensation plans, agreements, arrangements or policies that remain unpaid or unvested as of the date of the Board’s recoupment decision.
Ownership Guidelines. The Company has the following stock ownership guidelines for officers: CEO and Chairman (McManus) – 5 times base salary; CFO (Porter), COO (Richardson), and General Counsel (Woodruff) – 3 times base salary; and SVP (Godsey) – 2 times base salary. The Company’s other officers have ownership guidelines of 1 or 2 times base salary depending on position. For purposes of the guidelines, stock ownership includes (1) shares owned directly by the executive and immediate family members, (2) shareholdings in the Company’s
401(k) plan, and (3) deferred compensation shares. It is expected that an officer will not sell or otherwise transfer shares of Company common stock if the officer does not meet the ownership guidelines or if the sale or transfer would cause the officer to not meet the ownership guidelines, excepting shares sold or withheld for taxes on equity awards. As of December 31, 2017, each of our named executive officers maintained ownership exceeding the guidelines.
hedging or entering into pledging transactions
utilizing Company common stock.
COMPENSATIONRESULTSISK ASSESSMENT
Our executive compensation program incorporates performance goals related to a wide range of operational performance measures. By diversifying the performance measures and time horizons for assessing performance, we seek to mitigate the risk of significant compensation payments based on accomplishments in one area that may have a negative consequence for our business as a whole.
At least annually, the Compensation Committee assesses the compensation policies and practices applicable to our employees, including our executive officers, and considers whether
such policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
We believe our compensation programs strike the appropriate balance between the short-term and long-term performance of the Company. We consider the potential risks in our business when designing and administering our compensation programs, and we believe our balanced approach to performance measurement and compensation decisions mitigates the risk that employees, including our executive officers, will be encouraged to undertake excessive or inappropriate risk.
TAX DEDUCTIBILITYOF 2016 ADVISORY VOTEON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
AtOur AICP and performance share awards are intended to permit the 2016 Annual Meeting, the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation generated 95% of votes cast in favorCompany to deduct compensation expense under Section 162(m) of the Company’s executive compensation. As partInternal Revenue Code, which historically limited the tax deductibility of itsannual compensation paid to executives to $1 million, unless the compensation qualified as “performance-based.”
Federal legislation passed on December 22, 2017 executiverepealed the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for “performance-based” compensation and the limitation on deductibility generally was expanded to include all individuals who are
considered NEOs in any year beginning after December 31, 2016. As a result, compensation discussions,paid to our NEOs in excess of $1 million may not be deductible for taxable years commencing after December 31, 2017, subject to limited transition relief for arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017, the scope of which is uncertain. Further, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) in fact will. Despite the change in law, the Compensation Committee reviewedintends to continue to implement compensation programs that it believes are competitive and in the advisory vote result and considered it to be supportivebest interests of the Company’s compensation practices.Company and its shareholders.
For 2017, the basic structure of the Company’s executive compensation program remains unchanged. The Compensation Committee has established threshold, target and maximum performance factors for potential 2017 annual cash incentives under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy and goals. For 2017, the Committee plans to continue using a “plan within a plan” design which provides the Committee with greater discretion and control in evaluating performance and approving incentive payments while maintaining tax deductibility.
Stock Incentive Plan grants made in February 2017 included performance shares and restricted stock units, with the estimated value
allocated approximately 60% to performance shares and 40% to restricted stock units. As in prior years, payout of the 2017 performance share grants will be based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to the S&P Supercomposite Oil and Gas E&P Index as constituted on the first day of the applicable three-year award period.
Restrictions on restricted stock units granted in February 2017 will lapse in annual one-third increments. The Compensation Committee’s prior practice was to grant restricted stock units with three-year cliff vesting. The change to ratable vesting was made after discussion with the Committee’s compensation consultant and consideration of peer company practice.
The Compensation Committee’s usual practice has been to make annual salary adjustments effective as of the beginning of each calendar year. In light of then current oil and gas industry economic conditions, in January 2016, the Committee acted to freeze base salaries for the Company’s officers, including Mr. McManus. The 2016 salaries of Mr. McManus and the other officers remained unchanged from 2015.
As part of its consideration of executive compensation for 2017, the Compensation Committee approved executive salary adjustments consistent with the policies discussed above. Effective January 1, 2017, Mr. McManus’s salary was increased to $902,000. Mr. McManus has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2007.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and based on that review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
Jay Grinney, Chair
Kenneth W. Dewey
T. Michael GoodrichLaurence M. Downes
Stephen A. SniderM. James Gorrie
The following table sets forth the information required by Item 402 of RegulationS-K promulgated by the SEC. The amounts shown represent the compensation paid to our named executive officers for each fiscal year noted in the table, for services rendered to us. For a more complete discussion of the elements of compensation included in this table, please refer to the discussion reflected in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2634 of this Proxy Statement.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock ($)(1)(2) | Option ($)(1) | Non- Equity sation Earnings ($)(3) | Change in ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock ($)(1)(2) | Option ($)(1) | Non- Equity sation Earnings ($)(3) | Change in ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
McManus, II, James T. |
| 2016
|
| 884,000 | - | 2,644,138 | - | 1,392,477 | - | 64,719 | 4,985,334 |
| 2017
|
| 902,000 | - | 4,447,230 | - | 1,447,620 | - | 71,372 | 6,868,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015
|
| 884,000 | - | 5,499,904 | - | 1,415,814 | - | 97,104 | 7,896,822 |
| 2016
|
| 884,000 | - | 2,644,138 | - | 1,392,477 | - | 64,719 | 4,985,334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014
|
| 837,000 | 250,000 | 3,025,561 | 1,016,091 | 745,293 | - | 83,865 | 5,957,810 |
| 2015
|
| 884,000 | - | 5,499,904 | - | 1,415,814 | - | 97,104 | 7,896,822 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Porter, Jr., Charles W. |
| 2016
|
| 463,000 | - | 1,078,492 | - | 596,714 | - | 33,415 | 2,171,621 |
| 2017
|
| 472,000 | - | 1,812,370 | - | 619,783 | - | 37,675 | 2,941,828 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015
|
| 463,000 | - | 2,243,216 | - | 606,715 | - | 52,242 | 3,365,173 |
| 2016
|
| 463,000 | - | 1,078,492 | - | 596,714 | - | 33,415 | 2,171,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014
|
| 428,000 | 171,200 | 928,255 | 311,734 | 304,884 | 171,734 | 34,781 | 2,350,588 |
| 2015
|
| 463,000 | - | 2,243,216 | - | 606,715 | - | 52,242 | 3,365,173 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richardson, John S.
|
| 2016
|
| 510,000 | - | 1,188,000 | - | 657,288 | - | 36,917 | 2,392,205 |
| 2017
|
| 520,000 | 1,996,687 | 682,812 | 41,435 | 3,240,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015
|
| 510,000 | - | 2,470,908 | - | 668,304 | - | 66,617 | 3,715,829 |
| 2016
|
| 510,000 | - | 1,188,000 | - | 657,288 | - | 36,917 | 2,392,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014
|
| 462,000 | - | 1,113,306 | 373,848 | 399,867 | 592,818 | 47,850 | 2,989,689 |
| 2015
|
| 510,000 | - | 2,470,908 | - | 668,304 | - | 66,617 | 3,715,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Godsey, David
|
| 2016
|
| 385,000 | - | 346,515 | - | 413,490 | - | 27,603 | 1,172,608 |
| 2017
|
| 393,000 | - | 583,047 | - | 430,040 | - | 31,482 | 1,437,569 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015
|
| 385,000 | - | 720,584 | - | 420,420 | - | 56,333 | 1,582,337 |
| 2016
|
| 385,000 | - | 346,515 | - | 413,490 | - | 27,603 | 1,172,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014
|
| 370,000 | - | 416,104 | 139,698 | 244,889 | 62,010 | 37,440 | 1,270,141 |
| 2015
|
| 385,000 | - | 720,584 | - | 420,420 | - | 56,333 | 1,582,337 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodruff, J. David |
| 2016
|
| 380,000 | - | 502,931 | - | 353,704 | - | 27,230 | 1,263,865 |
| 2017
|
| 388,000 | - | 517,522 | - | 367,960 | - | 31,091 | 1,304,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015
|
| 380,000 | - | 1,045,947 | - | 359,632 | - | 42,188 | 1,827,767 |
| 2016
|
| 380,000 | - | 502,931 | - | 353,704 | - | 27,230 | 1,263,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014
|
| 369,000 | 110,700 | 355,636 | 119,433 | 197,142 | 315,181 | 38,569 | 1,505,661 |
| 2015
|
| 380,000 | - | 1,045,947 | - | 359,632 | - | 42,188 | 1,827,767 |
(1) | The amounts in column (e) reflect grant date fair value. The valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 6 to the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, |
(2) | Column (e), Stock Awards, includes restricted stock and performance share awards. |
(3) | The amounts in column (g) reflect Annual Incentive Compensation payouts as discussed on pages |
(4) | The amounts reported in column (i) for |
Defined Contributions ($) |
| |||
McManus | ||||
Porter | ||||
Richardson | ||||
Godsey | ||||
Woodruff |
The following table sets forth information with respect to annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives to our named executive officers. For a more complete discussion of the awards, please refer to the discussion of these incentives contained in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” beginning on page 2634 of this Proxy Statement.
Name
| Grant Date
| Meeting
| Estimated Future Payouts Under
| Estimated Future Payouts Under
| All Other
| Grant
| Grant
| Meeting
| Estimated Future Payouts Under
| Estimated Future Payouts Under
| All Other
| Grant
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold ($)(3)
| Target ($)
| Maximum
| Threshold (#)
| Target
| Maximum (#)
| Threshold ($)(3)
| Target ($)
| Maximum
| Threshold (#)
| Target
| Maximum (#)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
McManus | 3/14/16 | 3/14/16 | 486,200 | 972,400 | 1,944,800 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 496,100 | 992,200 | 1,984,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 2/8/16 | 12,441 | 49,764 | 99,528 | 56,500 | 2,644,138 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 9,860 | 39,440 | 78,880 | 35,553 | 4,447,230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Porter | 3/14/16 | 3/14/16 | 208,350 | 416,700 | 833,400 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 212,400 | 424,800 | 849,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 2/8/16 | 5,075 | 20,298 | 40,596 | 23,045 | 1,078,492 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 4,018 | 16,072 | 32,144 | 14,490 | 1,812,370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richardson | 3/14/16 | 3/14/16 | 229,500 | 459,000 | 918,000 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 234,000 | 468,000 | 936,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 2/8/16 | 5,590 | 22,359 | 44,718 | 25,385 | 1,188,000 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 4,427 | 17,707 | 35,414 | 15,963 | 1,996,687 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Godsey | 3/14/16 | 3/14/16 | 144,375 | 288,750 | 577,500 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 147,375 | 294,750 | 589,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 2/8/16 | 1,631 | 6,522 | 13,044 | 7,404 | 346,515 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 1,293 | 5,170 | 10,340 | 4,662 | 583,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodruff | 3/14/16 | 3/14/16 | 123,500 | 247,000 | 494,000 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 126,100 | 252,200 | 504,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 2/8/16 | 2,366 | 9,465 | 18,930 | 10,747 | 502,931 | 2/7/17 | 2/6/17 | 1,877 | 7,507 | 15,014 | 6,768 | 517,522 |
(1) | The Compensation Committee generally sets award amounts at a meeting that occurs the day prior to the grant date. |
(2) | Columns (c) – (e) reflect the annual cash incentive payout values for each named executive officer for |
(3) | The threshold amounts in this column assume that the baseline AICP performance hurdle established by the Compensation Committee was met. |
(4) | Payment of performance share awards will be based on the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to companies in the S&P Supercomposite E&P Index as comprised on the first day of the applicable award period (the “peer companies”). Columns (f) – (h) reflect the payment of performance share awards for each named executive officer if the threshold, target or maximum goals are met. The threshold goal will be met if the Company’s TSR percentile ranking relative to the peer companies is at least 25th, the target goal will be met if the Company’s TSR percentile ranking relative to the peer companies is 50th, and the maximum goal will be met if the Company’s TSR percentile ranking relative to the peer companies is 90th or above at the end of the respective award period. |
(5) | These performance shares have a three-year award period ending December 31, |
(6) | These restricted stock units granted February |
(7) | Column (j) represents the grant date fair value of the stock awards, as reflected in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(8) | Mr. Woodruff retired effective December 31, 2017. Mr. Woodruff’s AICP vested on December 31, 2017, and his unvested restricted stock and outstanding performance shares vested in accordance with the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan as detailed in “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 53 of this Proxy Statement. |
OUTSTANDINGEQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2016.2017. This table includes unexercised and unvested option awards and unvested restricted stock and performance share awards. Each equity grant is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each grant is shown following this table. For additional information about the outstanding equity awards, see the description of long-term incentive compensation in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26.34.
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities (#) Exercisable | Number of (#) Unexercisable | Equity (#) N/A | Option ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number (#) | Market Value ($) | Equity (#) | Equity ($) | Grant Date | Number of Securities (#) Exercisable | Number of (#) Unexercisable | Equity (#) N/A | Option ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number (#) | Market Value ($) | Equity (#) | Equity ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
McManus | 1/25/12 | 113,952 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | 1/25/12 | 113,952 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/24/13 | 48,612 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | 1/24/13 | 48,612 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 24,570 | 12,285(1) | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | 14,235 | (2) | 820,932 | 1/22/14 | 36,855 | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 33,054 | (3) | 1,906,224 | 79,734 | (5) | 4,598,260 | 2/10/15 | 33,054 | (1) | 1,902,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 56,500 | (4) | 3,258,355 | 49,764 | (6) | 2,869,890 | 2/9/16 | 56,500 | (2) | 3,252,705 | 99,528 | (4) | 5,729,827 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/17 | 35,553 | (3) | 2,045,635 | 78,880 | (5) | 4,541,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Porter | 1/26/11 | 12,045 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | 1/26/11 | 12,045 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/25/12 | 16,333 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | 1/25/12 | 16,333 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/24/13 | 12,078 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | 1/24/13 | 12,078 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 7,538 | 3,769(1) | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | 4,367 | (2) | 251,845 | 1/22/14 | 11,307 | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 13,482 | (3) | 777,507 | 32,520 | (5) | 1,875,428 | 2/10/15 | 13,482 | (1) | 776,159 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 23,045 | (4) | 1,329,005 | 20,298 | (6) | 1,170,586 | 2/9/16 | 23,045 | (2) | 1,326,701 | 40,596 | (4) | 2,337,112 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/17 | 14,490 | (3) | 834,189 | 32,144 | (5) | 1,850,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richardson | 1/23/08 | 21,275 | 60.56 | 1/22/2018 | 1/23/08 | 21,275 | 60.56 | 1/22/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/26/11 | 31,317 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | 1/26/11 | 31,317 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/25/12 | 38,095 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | 1/25/12 | 38,095 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/24/13 | 14,946 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | 1/24/13 | 14,946 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 9,040 | 4,520(1) | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | 5,238 | (2) | 302,075 | 1/22/14 | 13,560 | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 14,851 | (3) | 856,457 | 35,820 | (5) | 2,065,739 | 2/10/15 | 14,851 | (1) | 854,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 25,385 | (4) | 1,463,953 | 22,359 | (6) | 1,289,444 | 2/9/16 | 25,385 | (2) | 1,461,414 | 44,718 | (4) | 2,574,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/17 | 15,963 | (3) | 918,990 | 35,414 | (5) | 2,038,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Godsey | 1/24/13 | 5,097 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | 1/24/13 | 5,097 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 3,378 | 1,689(1) | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | 1,958 | (2) | 112,918 | 1/22/14 | 5,067 | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 4,331 | (3) | 249,769 | 10,446 | (5) | 602,421 | 2/10/15 | 4,331 | (1) | 249,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 7,404 | (4) | 426,989 | 6,522 | (6) | 376,124 | 2/9/16 | 7,404 | (2) | 426,248 | 13,044 | (4) | 750,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodruff | 1/23/08 | 12,100 | 60.56 | 1/22/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/28/09 | 7,281 | 29.79 | 1/27/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/27/10 | 15,468 | 46.69 | 1/26/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/26/11 | 14,789 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/25/12 | 16,029 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/24/13 | 4,557 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 2,888 | 1,444(1) | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | 1,673 | (2) | 96,482 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/15 | 6,287 | (3) | 362,571 | 15,162 | (5) | 874,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 10,747 | (4) | 619,780 | 9,465 | (6) | 545,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/17 | 4,662 | (3) | 268,391 | 10,340 | (5) | 595,274 |
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities (#) Exercisable | Number of (#) Unexercisable | Equity (#) N/A | Option ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number (#) | Market Value ($) | Equity (#) | Equity ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodruff(6) | 1/23/08 | 12,100 | 60.56 | 1/22/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/28/09 | 7,281 | 29.79 | 1/27/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/27/10 | 15,468 | 46.69 | 1/26/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/26/11 | 14,789 | 54.99 | 1/25/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/25/12 | 16,029 | 54.11 | 1/24/2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/24/13 | 4,557 | 48.36 | 1/23/2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/22/14 | 4,332 | 72.39 | 1/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/16 | 12,620 | (4)(6) | 726,533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/17 | 5,005 | (5)(6) | 288,138 |
Vesting Dates:
(1) |
These restricted stock units vest February 10, 2018. |
These restricted stock units vest February 9, 2019. |
(3) | These restricted stock units vest in equal installments on February 10, 2018, February 9, 2019 and February 15, 2020. |
(4) | These performance shares have a three-year award period that ends December 31, 2018. Payout amounts are calculated at maximum (200%) due to 2016-2017 period performance exceeding target performance measures. |
(5) | These performance shares have a three-year award period that ends December 31, |
(6) |
OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTEDIN 20162017
The following table provides information, for the named executive officers, on (1) stock option exercises during 2016,2017, including the number of shares acquired upon exercise and the value realized and (2) the number of shares acquired upon the vesting of stock awards and the value realized, each before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker commissions.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value on Vesting ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value on Vesting ($) | ||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e)(1) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e)(1) | ||||||||
McManus | - | - | 60,090 | 2,825,612 | - | - | 86,195 | 4,595,405 | ||||||||
Porter | - | - | 17,461 | 839,354 | - | - | 33,716 | 1,795,471 | ||||||||
Richardson | - | - | 21,099 | 1,011,109 | - | - | 37,566 | 2,001,134 | ||||||||
Godsey | - | - | 7,717 | 373,122 | - | - | 11,386 | 607,162 | ||||||||
Woodruff | 13,855 | 136,195 | 6,665 | 320,881 | - | - | 39,159(2) | 2,187,540(2) |
(1) | Value is the amount determined as of the Compensation Committee’s approval of the vesting of the shares. The same value is utilized for tax purposes. |
Certain of our officers, including each of the named executive officers, were party to Executive Retirement Supplement Agreements (“Supplemental Agreements”) which provided that the employee would receive a supplemental retirement benefit equal to the difference between 60% of the employee’s monthly compensation and the employee’s monthly retirement benefit under the Energen Corporation Retirement Income Plan (including Social Security benefit), which Retirement
Income Plan was terminated effective January 31, 2015. In October 2014, our Board of Directors approved termination of the Supplemental Agreements as of December 31, 2014, and for a distribution of the corresponding benefits in accordance with applicable law. Benefit accruals under the Supplemental Agreements (which were not subject to the payment restrictions under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) were paid as soon as practicable following termination of the
Supplemental Agreements. Benefit accruals that were subject to Code Section 409A could not be paid within 12 months of the date the Board of Directors took action to terminate the Supplemental Agreements (other than payments that would be payable under the terms of the Supplemental Agreements if the action to terminate had not occurred), but all such accruals had to be paid within 24 months of the same date.
Each of our named executive officers except Mr. Godsey had sufficient service with the
Company to have earned vested benefits under the Supplemental Agreements as of their termination dates. The table below sets forth information on the pension benefit payments for each of the named executive officers under the Supplemental Agreements during 2016, and the remaining value of the accumulated benefit at December 31, 2016. As noted above, the Supplemental Agreements have been terminated and no further benefits will accrue thereunder.
(2) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
|
NONQUALIFIED DEFERREDCOMPENSATION TABLEIN 20162017
The table below provides information on thenon-qualified deferred compensation of the named executive officers in 20162017 pursuant to the Company’s 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan. For a more detailed discussion of the 1997 Deferred Compensation Plan, refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2634 of this Proxy Statement.
Name | Executive ($)(1) | Registrant ($)(1) | Aggregate ($)(2) | Aggregate ($) | Aggregate at Last FYE ($)(3) | Executive ($)(1) | Registrant ($)(1) | Aggregate ($)(2) | Aggregate ($) | Aggregate at Last FYE ($)(3) | ||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | ||||||||||
McManus | 37,140 | 45,393 | 234 | 99,083 | 79,645 | 31,600 | 48,958 | 450 | 80,730 | 79,923 | ||||||||||
Porter | 11,880 | 14,520 | 26,371 | - | 170,803 | 10,100 | 15,648 | 18,912 | - | 215,464 | ||||||||||
Richardson | 14,700 | 17,967 | 39,788 | 98,296 | 125,249 | 12,500 | 19,367 | 10,982 | 25,648 | 142,450 | ||||||||||
Godsey | 7,200 | 8,800 | 6,977 | - | 65,510 | 6,150 | 9,528 | 9,755 | - | 90,943 | ||||||||||
Woodruff | 6,900 | 8,433 | 20,704 | - | 122,420 | 5,900 | 9,140 | 12,006 | - | 149,466 |
(1) | Amounts reported in columns (b) and (c) are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | None of the amounts reported in column (d) are reported in the Summary Compensation Table because Energen does not pay above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. |
(3) | Amounts reported in column (f) for each named executive officer include amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years when earned if that officer’s compensation was required to be disclosed in a prior year. Amounts previously reported in such years include previously earned, but deferred, salary, Annual Incentive Compensation, stock awards and Energen’s contributions on behalf of such officer. |
PPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL
Severance Agreements.We have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with each of Messrs. McManus, Porter, Richardson and Godsey providing for severance compensation in the event of termination prior to the occurrence of a change in control event. Following the occurrence of a change in control event, Energen’s existing Severance Compensation Agreements would be the operative documents. The Executive Severance Agreements have a term ending December 31, 2020. In the event the Company terminates a named executive officer’s employment other than for cause, death or disability, or such officer terminates his or her employment for good reason (as each term is defined in the Executive Severance Agreements), then, following execution of a release by such officer, Energen shall pay such officer the following: (i) a multiple of the officer’s salary and target bonus; (ii) the unpaid bonus for any fiscal year completed on or prior to the termination date determined based on actual performance and in the same manner as for other executive officers, with all individual and subjective performance metrics, if any, deemed satisfied at target with no negative discretion on an individual basis; (iii) prorated target bonus for the year of termination (or, if necessary for the bonus to be deductible for tax purposes, an amount determined by the Compensation Committee based on actual performance and in the same manner as for other executive officers, with all individual and subjective performance metrics, if any, deemed satisfied at target with no negative discretion on an individual basis); and (iv) a minimum of 12 months of medical premiums. In addition, the officer remains entitled to indemnification by Energen to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, and, for at least six years following the date of termination, Energen would continue to provide directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage to the officer at a level no
less favorable than in effect as of the effective date of the Executive Severance Agreement. Any such termination under an Executive Severance Agreement would be treated as a “qualified termination” as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan. Mr. McManus’ severance multiple is 2.0 with 24 months of medical premiums. Messrs. Porter’s and Richardson’s severance multiple is 1.5 with 18 months of medical premiums, and Mr. Godsey’s severance multiple is 1.0 with 12 months of medical premiums. Finally, in the event of a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Severance Compensation Agreements) within one (1) year of an officer’s termination without cause or for good reason, the officer would receive, without duplication, the additional compensation and benefits that the officer would have received had the officer been terminated following such Change in Control under the terms of the Severance Compensation Agreements.
For purposes of the Executive Severance Agreements, “cause” is defined as: (i) the willful and continued failure of the officer to substantially perform the officer’s duties with Energen and its affiliates (other than any such failure resulting from the officer’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the officer specifically identifying the manner in which the officer has not substantially performed the officer’s duties; (ii) the officer engaging in willful misconduct that it demonstrably injurious to Energen and its affiliates monetarily or otherwise; or (iii) the conviction of the officer of a felony. The Executive Severance Agreements state that “no act or failure to act, on the part of the Executive, shall be considered “willful” unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by Executive in bad faith or without reasonable belief that Executive’s action or omission was in the best interests of”
Energen. If curable, an officer may only be terminated if such action or omission has not been cured by the officer within thirty (30) days following written notice from Energen. Further, terminations for Cause must be approved by the affirmative vote of not less thantwo-thirds of the entire membership of the board of directors
(excluding the officer, if he is then a member of the board), which determination by the board shall be subject to de novo review by a court of law. “Good reason” has the same definition as is contained in Energen’s Severance Compensation Agreements.
Assuming a termination under the terms of the Executive Severance Agreements on December 31, 2017, other than for cause, death or disability or by the executive for good reason, we estimate that the following officers would receive the following benefits from Energen:
McManus $ | Porter $ | Richardson $ | Godsey $ | |||||
Cash Severance (1) | 3,788,400 | 1,345,200 | 1,482,000 | 687,750 | ||||
Medical Premiums | 34,684 | 32,876 | 26,013 | 17,342 |
(1) | Does not include Annual Incentive Compensation Plan payout for 2017 fiscal year, which is shown in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 47. |
Change in Control Severance Agreements. In addition to our Executive Severance Agreements, we have entered into Severance Compensation Agreements with certain officers including Messrs. McManus, Porter, Richardson, Godsey and Woodruff.Woodruff (Mr. Woodruff’s agreement terminated upon his retirement on December 31, 2017). We designed the agreements to retain the executives and provide continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in control of the Company. Each such agreement provides that if, during a base period following the first to occur of a change in control of the Company (as defined in the agreements) or shareholder approval of a transaction that will constitute a change in control, the employee’s employment is terminated in a qualified termination, then we will pay the employee an amount equal to a percentage of the employee’s (a) annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control, plus (b) the employee’s highest annual cash bonus compensation for the three fiscal years immediately prior to the fiscal year during which the change in control occurs.
Continuity of management or retention is encouraged by providing severance benefits in the event of loss of employment following a change in control. The percentage payable and base period varies by executive and ranges from 100% with aone-year base period to 300% with
a three-year base period. The 100%, 200% and 300% multiples reflect consideration of the executive’s level of corporate responsibility, specialized skills, and availability of other job opportunities. A higher multiple reflects a higher importance of retention. Thus, officers with higher levels of corporate responsibility or specialized skill or knowledge have higher multiples. Officers who, due to senior responsibilities or specialized skills, may have fewer alternative employment opportunities also have higher multiples to provide compensation during a longer job search. All named executive officers except Mr. Godsey have a 300% multiple and three-year base period. Mr. Godsey has a 200% multiple and atwo-year base
period. The Severance Compensation Agreements also provide for the continuance of certain insurance and other employee benefits for a period of twenty-four months following any such termination of employment.
For purposes of the Severance Compensation Agreements, (1) the term “qualified termination” means a termination (a) by the Company other than for cause, (b) by the employee for good reason or (c) by written agreement to such effect between the employee and the Company, (2) the term “cause” generally means failure to substantially perform duties, misconduct injurious to the Company or conviction of a felony, and (3) the term “good reason” generally
means a required relocation from the employee’s current place of employment or a material diminution in the authority, duties, responsibilities or benefits of the employee’s job.
As defined in our Severance Compensation Agreements, as well as our Stock Incentive Plan and Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, a “change in control” would include any of the following events:
¡ | a majority of such Directors are replaced such that a majority of our current Directors does not approve their election or nomination for election; or |
¡ | Directors are replaced by an individual or individuals whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest; or |
Assuming the occurrence of a triggering event on December 31, 20162017 for payment of change in control related compensation, we estimate that the following officers would receive the following benefits:benefits (due to Mr. Woodruff’s actual retirement on December 31, 2017, we have not provided estimates of his potential payout under the Severance Compensation Agreement):
McManus $ | Porter $ | Richardson $ | Godsey $ | Woodruff $ | McManus $ | Porter $ | Richardson $ | Godsey $ | ||||||||||
Cash Severance | 6,899,442 | 2,682,967 | 3,534,912 | 1,276,637 | 2,218,896 | 6,953,442 | 3,236,145 | 3,564,912 | 1,626,840 | |||||||||
Health & Welfare Benefit (1) | 29,198 | 31,176 | 25,357 | 25,002 | 24,987 | 37,231 | 45,295 | 36,430 | 36,142 | |||||||||
Excise Tax reimbursement (2) | - | - | - | N/A | - |
(1) | Represents the incremental value of two years continuation of medical, life and disability insurance benefits. |
Equity Award Severance Protections.The Stock Incentive Plan also provides that in the event of a termination of employment, other than a “qualified termination” or a “change in control termination,” all unvested options expire and all unvested restricted stock and outstanding restricted stock units and performance shares are forfeited. In the event of a qualified termination, unvested options, unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units with a grant date at least ten months prior to the date of termination vest and outstanding performance shares with a grant date at least ten months prior to the date of termination remain eligible for payout subject to the applicable award period and performance conditions, with the number of performance shares reduced based on the number of months of the award period remaining following termination. Under the Stock Incentive Plan the term “qualified termination” means:
(1) | death or disability; |
(2) |
(3) | termination designated in writing as a qualified termination by Energen or an Energen subsidiary. |
In the event of a change in control termination, unvested options, unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units vest and outstanding performance shares pay out at target performance within thirty days of termination. The Board of Directors defined “change in control termination” to mean:
(1) | an involuntary termination other than for cause after the occurrence of a change in control; or |
(2) | a voluntary termination for good reason entitling the employee to severance compensation under a written change in control severance agreement. |
The following table contains a schedule of unvested options and restricted stock units that would vest upon a qualified termination or a change in control termination, valued as of December 31, 2016:2017 (Mr. Woodruff’s restricted stock units vested in connection with his retirement, a “qualified termination” under the Stock Incentive Plan):
Name | Shares (#) | Value of ($) | Restricted Stock Units (#) | Value of Restricted Stock Units ($) | ||||
McManus | 12,285 | - | 103,789 | 5,985,511 | ||||
Porter | 3,769 | - | 40,894 | 2,358,357 | ||||
Richardson | 4,520 | - | 45,474 | 2,622,485 | ||||
Godsey | 1,689 | - | 13,693 | 789,676 | ||||
Woodruff | 1,444 | - | 18,707 | 1,078,833 |
Shares (#) Value of ($) McManus Porter Richardson Godsey WoodruffName
Represented by
Unvested Options
Unvested
Options Restricted
Stock Units
(#) Value of
Restricted
Stock Units
($) - - 125,107 7,202,410 - - 51,017 2,937,049 - - 56,199 3,235,376 - - 16,397 943,975 - - 23,802 1,370,281
The following table contains a schedule of unvested performance shares that would vest pro rata based on the number of months of the award period remaining following a qualified termination. The pro rata portion of the performance shares would remain eligible for payout subject to satisfaction of the performance conditions and are valued as of December 31, 2017 (a pro rata portion of Mr. Woodruff’s performance shares vested upon his retirement on December 31, 2017). Pay out amounts are calculated at maximum (200%) due to performance periods exceeding target performance measures at December 31, 2017.
Name | Performance Shares(#) | Value of Performance Shares($) | ||
McManus | 92,645 | 5,333,573 | ||
Porter | 37,779 | 2,174,937 | ||
Richardson | 41,617 | 2,395,891 | ||
Godsey | 12,143 | 699,073 | ||
Woodruff | 17,625 | 1,014,671 |
The following table contains a schedule of unvested performance shares that would vest and pay out at target performance upon a change in control termination, valued as of December 31, 2016:2017 (excluding Mr. Woodruff, who retired effective December 31, 2017):
Name | Performance Shares(#) | Value of Performance Shares($) | Performance Shares(#) | Value of Performance Shares($) | ||||
McManus | 89,631 | 5,169,020 | 89,204 | 5,135,474 | ||||
Porter | 36,558 | 2,108,300 | 36,370 | 2,093,821 | ||||
Richardson | 40,269 | 2,322,313 | 40,066 | 2,306,600 | ||||
Godsey | 11,745 | 677,334 | 11,692 | 673,108 | ||||
Woodruff | 17,046 | 983,043 |
Annual Incentive Severance Protections.Our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan provides that upon a change in control and termination of a participant’s employment, the participant will receive a pro rata incentive based on target performance and the number of days of employment during the Plan year. The Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan also provides that in the event a participant terminates employment due to retirement, death or disability during a performance period, the participant shall receive an incentive equal to the amount the participant would have received as an incentive if the participant had remained an employee through
the end of the performance period multiplied by a fraction which reduces the award in proportion to the amount of time remaining in the performance period. If a participant’s employment is terminated for any other reason during a performance period, the participant shall receive no incentive payment for such performance period unless the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, determines to pay
such participant (other than a participant terminated for cause) up to a pro rata incentive payment. Assuming a December 31, 20162017 triggering event, there would be no pro rata target performance pay out, since the performance period would have concluded and the amounts owed to the participants could be determined in accordance with the terms of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
Rules adopted by the SEC following passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act require us to provide a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median annual total compensation of our employees. We identified our median employee by comparison of all salary, overtime, matching and elective contributions to our 401(k) and deferred compensation plans, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive equity vested in 2017 as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on FormW-2 for 2017 for all of our employees (excluding the Chief Executive Officer) as of December 31, 2017. Due to our employment of 396 employees (other than the Chief Executive Officer) at December 31, 2017, we identified two potential median employees. Of the two median employees, one had been hired during 2017 and his earnings were annualized for the year in accordance with SEC rule requirements, while the other employee had worked for the entire year, but had slightly lower total compensation. We identified the full-year employee as our median employee because his earnings also included a bonus and we
determined that he was more representative of the median employee.
For 2017, our last completed fiscal year:
Based on estimates and information set forth above, for 2017 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. McManus, our Chief Executive Officer, to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees was 54.3 to 1.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“(“SAY-ON-PAY” VOTE)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was signed into law July 21, 2010, provides shareholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay”“Say-on-Pay” vote, gives shareholders the opportunity to approve, reject or abstain from voting with respect to our fiscal 20162017 executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to the named executive officers of the Company.
As discussed beginning on page 2634 of this Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to serve the Company and its shareholders by aligning executive compensation with shareholder interests and by encouraging and rewarding management initiatives that will benefit the Company and its shareholders, customers, and employees over the long-term.
The Company is presenting this proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to express your view on our executive compensation by voting for or against the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of the named executive officers of Energen Corporation, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosures contained in the Company’s 20172018 Proxy Statement.”
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on, and who vote for and against, this proposal.
This proposal allows our shareholders to express their opinions regarding the decisions of the Compensation Committee on the prior year’s annual compensation to the named executive officers. Although your vote on this matter is
advisory in nature and therefore will not be binding upon the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, your advisory vote will serve as an additional tool to
guide the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee in continuing to improve the alignment of the Company’s executive compensation programs with the interests of the Company and its shareholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (“FREQUENCY” VOTE)
The Dodd-Frank Act provides shareholders with an opportunity to advise the Board of Directors as to whether the Company should conduct an advisory vote with respect to its executive compensation at every annual, second annual or third annual meeting of shareholders. This
proposal, known also as the “Frequency” vote, provides shareholders with the opportunity to vote at this Annual Meeting on the frequency with which the Company should conduct advisory Say-on-Pay votes in future annual meetings.
The Company is presenting this proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to express your view on the appropriate frequency (one year, every two years, every three years, or abstain) of conducting an advisory Say-on-Pay shareholder vote on our executive compensation by voting for one of the following options:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, that Energen Corporation conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of its named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosures contained in the Company’s proxy statement for the relevant year:
[SELECT ONLY ONE OPTION BELOW]
One year;
Every two years;
Every three years; or
Abstain”
The option that receives the highest number of votes cast by the shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation deemed to have been approved by the shareholders.
Your vote on this matter is advisory in nature and therefore will not be binding upon the Company or the Board of Directors. However,
we value our shareholders’ opinions and will take into account the outcome of the vote when making future decisions about how often the Company conducts an advisory shareholder vote on the compensation of named executive officers.
The Board of Directors believes that submitting the advisory vote on executive compensation to shareholders every year is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders at this time.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE OF “ONE YEAR” FOR THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH AN ADVISORY VOTE ON THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OCCURS.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20182019 ANNUAL MEETING
In order to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and form of proxy, proposals of shareholders submitted in accordance with SEC Rule14a-8 and intended to be presented at the 20182019 Annual Meeting must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices no later than November 22, 2017.2018. If a shareholder desires to bring other business before the 20182019 Annual Meeting without including such proposal in the Company’s Proxy Statement, the shareholder must notify the Company in writing no earlier than January 3, 20182019 and no later than February 2, 2018.2019 in accordance with the Company’s By Laws. Shareholders who wish to nominate individuals to serve on the Board of Directors must follow the requirements set forth in SectionSections 1.11 and 1.12 of the Company’s Bylaws.By Laws. In order to be eligible to nominate a person for election to our Board of Directors a shareholder must (i) comply with the notice procedures set forth in the BylawsBy Laws and (ii) be a shareholder of record on the date of giving such notice as well as on the meeting date. To be timely, any shareholder who wishes to make a nomination to be considered at the 20182019 Annual Meeting must deliver the notice specified by our BylawsBy Laws between January 3, 20182019 and February 2, 2018.2019. The BylawsBy Laws contain a number of substantive and procedural requirements that should be reviewed by any interested shareholder. Shareholder proposals and director nominations should be directed to Energen Corporation, 605 Richard Arrington Jr. Blvd. North, Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
ENERGEN CORPORATION
Chairman of the Board
Birmingham, Alabama
March 22, 20172018
Appendix A
The following peer group is referred to on page 2937 of the Proxy Statement.
Antero Resource Corporation
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.
Cimarex Energy Co
Comstock Resources Inc.
Concho Resources
Continental Resources,Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Denbury Resources Inc.
EP Energy Corporation
EQT Corp
EXCO Resources, Inc.Gulfport Energy Corp.
Forest Oil Corp
Laredo Petroleum, Inc.
Linn EnergyMatador Resources
Newfield Exploration Co
Pioneer Natural Resources Co
Oasis Petroleum, Inc.
PDC Energy, Inc.
QEP Resources
Quicksilver Resources Inc.
Range Resources Corp
Sandridge Energy, Inc.
SM Energy Co
Southwestern Energy Co
Ultra Petroleum Corp
Whiting Petroleum Corp
WPX Energy, Inc.
Appendix B
Reconciliation of Non-GAAPNon-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, (EBITDAX) is aNon-GAAP financial measure (GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles). As defined by the Compensation Committee, Adjusted EBITDAX further excludes the impact of (i) openmark-to-market gains and losses, (ii) changes in accounting principles or other provisions that materially affect reported results, (iii) gains or losses (net of severance payments) on asset dispositions with proceeds greater than $5 million, and (iv) EBITDAX on properties held for sale as of January 1, 2017. The Compensation Committee believes that Adjusted EBITDAX is an appropriate performance measure for use in connection with the Company’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. Following satisfaction of the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan performance hurdle, the Compensation Committee added certainnon-operational expenses to the Adjusted EBITDAX performance measure.
|
Reconciliation To GAAP Information | ||||
($ in millions) | 12/31/ | |||
Energen Net Income | ||||
Interest expense (GAAP) | ||||
Income tax | ( | ) | ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (GAAP) | ||||
Accretion expense (GAAP) | ||||
Exploration expense (GAAP) | ||||
Adjustment for asset impairment (GAAP) | ||||
Adjustment for mark-to-market losses | ||||
| ||||
Energen Adjusted EBITDAX from Continuing Operations (Non-GAAP) | ||||
Non-operational expenses | 3.9 | |||
|
| |||
Energen Adjusted EBITDAX | ||||
|
|
Note: Amounts may not sum due to roundingrounding.
ENERGEN CORPORATION
605 Richard Arrington, Jr. Blvd. North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2707
(205)326-2700
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Energen Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 3, 2017
Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual shareholders’ meeting are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is important!
This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at:
| ||
| ||
When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials.
|
|
02J3TD
Energen’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on May 3, 2017 at 605 Richard Arrington, Jr. Blvd. N. Birmingham, Alabama at 8:30 a.m. Central Time.
Proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting are listed below along with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
The Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOR Proposals 1 through 3 and1 Year for Proposal 4:
PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the annual meeting, please bring this notice with you.
NOTICETOEMPLOYEESAVINGSPLANPARTICIPANTS. If you are a participant in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) you have the right to direct the Trustee under the Plan how full shares of the Company’s Common Stock allocable to your account under the Plan as of February 28, 2017, should be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Energen Corporation. Energen’s stock transfer agent, Computershare, will forward your instructions to the Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, Trustee of the Plan. If directions are not received by the transfer agent on or before April 28, 2017, you will be treated as directing the Plan’s Trustee to vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee has received timely instructions from others who do vote.
Directions to the Energen Corporation 2017 Annual Meeting
Directions to the Energen Corporation 2017 annual
meeting are available by calling Investor Relations at
1-800-654-3206.
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
02J3TD
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION |
|
• Go towww.investorvote.com/EGN
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
| ||||||||
Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. | ☒ |
Electronic Voting Instructions
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 2, 2018. (April 30, 2018 for
Employee Savings Plan Participants) | ||
Vote by Internet | ||
• Go towww.investorvote.com/EGN | ||
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone | ||
• Follow the |
Vote by telephone
Annual Meeting Proxy Card |
qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q
A | Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOR all the nominees listed andFOR Proposals 2 and |
1. Election of Directors - Nominees:
1. | Election of Directors - Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | ||||
01 - Jonathan Z. Cohen | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
02 - William G. Hargett | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
03 - Alan A. Kleier | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
04 - Vincent J. Intrieri | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
05 - Laurence M. Downes | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||
06 - Lori A. Lancaster | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
Abstain | |||||||||||
2. | Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||
3. |
| the advisory(non-binding) resolution relating to executive compensation | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
02 - M. James Gorrie
☐
☐
☐
3. Approval of the advisory (non-binding) resolution relating to executive compensation
☐
☐
☐
03 - James T. McManus, II
☐
☐
☐
4. Approval of the advisory (non-binding) resolution on the frequency of a shareholders’ advisory vote relating to executive compensation (“Frequency” vote)
1 year
☐
☐
☐
☐
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
B | Non-Voting Items |
Change of Address— Please print new address below. | Comments— Please print your comments below. | |||
C | Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below |
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title as such.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. | Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. | Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. | ||||||
/ / | ||||||||
|
|
02J3RC02SIKD
NOTICETO TO EMPLOYEESAVINGS SAVINGS PLANPARTICIPANTS. PARTICIPANTS.If you are a participant in the Energen Corporation Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) you have the right to direct the Trustee under the Plan how full shares of the Company’s Common Stock allocable to your account under the Plan as of February 28, 2017,2018, should be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Energen Corporation (the “Company”). Energen’s stock transfer agent, Computershare, will forward your instructions to the Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, Trustee of the Plan. If directions are not received by the transfer agent on or before April 28, 2017,30, 2018, you will be treated as directing the Plan’s Trustee to vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares for which the Trustee has received timely instructions from others who do vote.
Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual Report to Shareholderson Form10-K for 2017 are available at:
www.annualmeeting.energen.com
q
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q
Proxy — ENERGEN CORPORATION
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders — May 3, 20172018
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY
The undersigned hereby appoints James T. McManus, II and J. David Woodruff,John K. Molen, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies andattorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote as provided on the other side, all the shares of Energen Corporation Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come beforeat the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held May 3, 2017,2018, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting, upon all matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.This proxy will be voted in accordance with the specific indications on the other side. In the absence of such indications, this proxy will be voted FOR all the nominees listed for election as directors on the other side and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)